Is there a way I can add a weight value is a file attachment is a
certain type, ie GIF?
David
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at
PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 4:10 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] WEIGHT for a File Attachment
Is there a way I can add a weight value is a file attachment is a
certain type, ie GIF?
David
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
Title: Weight
I am curious about why you use such a high weight of 200. I use the default 10 14 and 20. Is there any benefit to using higher weights?
Regards,
Kelly Scotto
Assistant Network Administrator
Speedee Cash Management
850-682-0475 ex.1801
and delete at 300. Nice round numbers that the users can
understand.
- Original Message -
From:
Kelly
Scotto
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:31
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight
I am curious about why you use such a high weight
Title: Message
Added
the personal touch. Gotcha!
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Scott FisherSent: Thursday, February 02, 2006
1:57 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail] Weight
When I
In $default$.junkmail, WEIGHT10 SUBJECT [SPAM %WEIGHT%] used to change
the subject line to:
[SPAM 30] Quality Opportunity in 24 hours.
The new version now changes it to:
[SPAMQuality Opportunity in 24 hours.
Thanks,
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL
Queue Monitoring, Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Shadix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 6:36 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight values used
How much extra processing to an e-mail does adding a bunch of weight
range statements like:
WEIGHT1019 weightrange x x 10 19
WEIGHT2029 weightrange x x 20 29
WEIGHT3034 weightrange x x 30 34
WEIGHT3539 weightrange x x 35 39
I really just want these just to report on from the logs rather than
Also if I so not want these tests to show up in the %TESTSFAILED%
variable then would I add
HIDETESTS WEIGHT1019 WEIGHT2029..
And would I need to put in the $default$.junkmail file
WEIGHT1019 LOG
Correct. Note that you could simply not include the WEIGHT1019 line
in
the
Scott,
How much extra processing to an e-mail does adding a bunch of weight
range statements like:
WEIGHT1019 weightrange x x 10 19
WEIGHT2029 weightrange x x 20 29
WEIGHT3034 weightrange x x 30 34
WEIGHT3539 weightrange x x 35 39
I really just want these just to report on from the logs
Scott,
This may be very minor and possibly just cosmetic, I have found that
some messages will have a %WEIGHT% variable returned for a WARN action
that is -100 when such a score is impossible on our system. The
example below is from a message that scored 0 in the logs (seemingly
correct), but
This may be very minor and possibly just cosmetic, I have found that some
messages will have a %WEIGHT% variable returned for a WARN action that is
-100 when such a score is impossible on our system. The example below is
from a message that scored 0 in the logs (seemingly correct), but shows
Scott,
Sorry, it wasn't the WARN action, it's coming from the XOUTHEADER
(gatewayed client in this example):
XOUTHEADERX-MailPure: Spam Score: %WEIGHT%
- or -
XINHEADERX-MailPure: Spam Score: %WEIGHT%
1.79i6 is the version that I am running presently. Following are some
1.79i6 is the version that I am running presently. Following are some
other examples, with the first appearance in my inbox being April 12th
which happens to be less than a week after you added the weight variable
to the external tests, and just after you resolved the issue where the
weights
whatever time you choose. See the Declude website, Tools page
for links to these and other tools.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: Goran Jovanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 8:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight and Action
To paraphrase you JunkMail looks through all the actions of all the
tests that have been tripped starting with the most severe (strict)
DELETE and working down the list.
That's another way of looking at it. In this case, if there is a conflict
with an action that has already been taken, the one
If you are trying out a new test and are not sure what it is going to do
you set the WEIGHT of that test to 0 and then monitor it. One way would
be to use a HOLD action on that test.
My question is if the WEIGHT was not set to 0 but say 10 and the action
is HOLD will the e-mail be held regardless
Well, you might also have a WHITELIST action, or a WEIGHT action for a
high
value that does a DELETE.
I guess what is important is to find out the precedence of the ACTION
keywords. So if a WEIGHT10 is set with a DELETE action and the test that
you are testing has a WEIGHT of 1 and the
I guess what is important is to find out the precedence of the ACTION
keywords.
In the case of multiple actions, Declude JunkMail will try to use
both. But in combinations where they cannot logically be combined (such as
HOLD and DELETE -- doing one means that you can't do the other), Declude
Think of it this way -- if you used the HOLD action for E-mail with a
weight of 5 or higher, and the DELETE action for E-mail with a weight
of
10
or higher, which action would you want taken on an E-mail with a
weight of
25?
In your description I would want the DELETE taken.
I was
Scott, I have setup my filter files with SKIPIFWEIGHT 36, which is my
delete weight. However, I just noticed that it appears that not all other
JM processing happens before the filter files are called. You will see from
the log snippet below that most of my filter files were skipped because of a
Of Bill Landry
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight processing
Scott, I have setup my filter files with SKIPIFWEIGHT 36, which is my
delete weight. However, I just noticed that it appears that not all other
JM processing happens before
Kami Razvan wrote:
I wish we could also skip the tests for negative weight.. Because right now
the emails that we want to be delivered by negative weight actually will go
through all tests since none can exit on a negative limit.
I believe the idea here is to place the negative weight filters
] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 2:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight processing
Kami Razvan wrote:
I wish we could also skip the tests for negative weight.. Because right
now the emails that we want to be delivered by negative
Scott, I have setup my filter files with SKIPIFWEIGHT 36, which is my
delete weight. However, I just noticed that it appears that not all other
JM processing happens before the filter files are called
That is by design. We may make an attempt to get the filter tests to run
last, but we
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott, I have setup my filter files with SKIPIFWEIGHT 36, which is my
delete weight. However, I just noticed that it appears that not all
other
JM processing happens before the filter files are called
That is by
My message headers are no long displaying the weight of messages. The
weight rules are working. I have weight 10 holding and weight 20
deleting, that works great. I'd still like to see the weight score in the
message header if it's less than 10.
What have you changed recently? What were you
their level of spam filtering.
Possible?
Thanks,
Steve
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight of in header
My message headers are no long displaying the weight
I downloaded new global and junkmail files a few months back to update my
dated ones.
Prior to that it would say exceeded weight of x in the headers. I might
have had warn instead of hold or Delete.
Either way, it would be nice to display the weight in the header so our
users can set their level
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight of in header
I downloaded new global and junkmail files a few months back to update my
dated ones.
Prior to that it would say exceeded weight of x in the headers. I
might
have had warn instead of hold or Delete.
Either way, it would be nice
A header with the total weight regardless, from 1 to 9. Anything 10 or
above we take care of by default.
Do you mean regardless as in every E-mail should have it (XINHEADER would
do that), or only on E-mails with a weight from 1-9? If from 1-9, you
would need to set up a weightrange test
just add
XINHEADER X-Declude-Note: weight: %WEIGHT%
to the global.cfg file
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 12:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight of in header
A header with the total weight
Hello,
I just recived several spams to my box all with weights greater then
I allow (weight of 49). Does anyone see anything wrong here?
GLOBAL.CFG
WEIGHT1 weightrange x x 5 11
WEIGHT2 weightrange x x 12 17
WEIGHT3 weightrange x x 18 36
WEIGHT4 weightrange x x 37 0
$default$.junkmail
- Original Message -
From: Paul Ingram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just recived several spams to my box all with weights greater then
I allow (weight of 49). Does anyone see anything wrong here?
GLOBAL.CFG
WEIGHT1 weightrange x x 5 11
WEIGHT2 weightrange x x 12 17
WEIGHT3 weightrange x
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WEIGHT
CATCHALLMAILS SUBJECT [Weight=%WEIGHT%]
in my something.junkmail file but the weight did not show up in the subject
If I have:
CATCHALLMAILS SUBJECT [Weight=%WEIGHT%]
WEIGHT10SUBJECT (SUSPECTED SPAM)
In the something.junkmail file will both be appended or will CATCHALLMAILS
only show up?
Only one will be appended (I believe it is the last one listed in the
global.cfg file that will
In my something.junkmail file I have:
WEIGHT10SUBJECT (SUSPECTED SPAM)
I know I can add %WEIGHT% to the end if I want the weight to show up in the
subject but how can I have theweight show up in the subject of ALL emails I
receive even if they do not receive a weight?
TIA
---
[This
In my something.junkmail file I have:
WEIGHT10SUBJECT (SUSPECTED SPAM)
I know I can add %WEIGHT% to the end if I want the weight to show up in the
subject but how can I have theweight show up in the subject of ALL emails I
receive even if they do not receive a weight?
You could use:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 1:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WEIGHT
In my something.junkmail file I have:
WEIGHT10SUBJECT (SUSPECTED SPAM)
I know I can add %WEIGHT
CATCHALLMAILS SUBJECT [Weight=%WEIGHT%]
in my something.junkmail file but the weight did not show up in the subject
of a message that I just received.
Are you sure that the something.junkmail file was the one used to process
the E-mail (aliases can cause Declude to use a different file than
No, assuming that the CATCHALLMAILS catchallmails x x 0 0 line is in
there (it is in the default config file).
By default, it is commented out, no?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
No, assuming that the CATCHALLMAILS catchallmails x x 0 0 line is in
there (it is in the default config file).
By default, it is commented out, no?
It was originally, no longer is commented out with the default settings.
-Scott
---
Declude
I had a customer send me the headers of an email that did not get caught
held ) that should have.. At least I think it should have...
snip
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-RBL-Warning: BADHEADERS: This E-mail was sent from a broken mail client
[801f].
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent
This is a weird one, I've setup 2 weights in global.cfg as:
WEIGHT15weight x x 15 0
WEIGHT30weight x x 30 0
and use in global.cfg and $default$.junkmail:
WEIGHT30ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WEIGHT15ROUTETO [EMAIL
Thanks Scott, I'll try the weightrange option!
Cheers
Jools
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:01:33 -0400, you wrote:
This is a weird one, I've setup 2 weights in global.cfg as:
WEIGHT15weight x x 15 0
WEIGHT30weight x x 30 0
and use
This is a weird one, I've setup 2 weights in global.cfg as:
WEIGHT15weight x x 15 0
WEIGHT30weight x x 30 0
and use in global.cfg and $default$.junkmail:
WEIGHT30ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WEIGHT15ROUTETO [EMAIL
Hi,
this list has served me well so far:
HELO8 CONTAINS$domain
REVDNS 8 ENDSWITH.a83c9d.net
REVDNS 8 ENDSWITH.are.net
REVDNS 8 ENDSWITH.azogle.com
REVDNS 8 ENDSWITH.bestpost.net
Title: Message
Sorry.. the last
post about the filename was not the issue causing the
problem.
It seems like if
the weight is put as a real number (20.00) the system somehow passes over it and
does not detect the rest.
The database
output was creating:
MAILFROM 20.00
CONTAINS inkjet
Here is an example of an e-mail that according to the declude log failed
2 weight range tests. How?
rom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 27 08:56:19 2002
Received: from SMTP32-FWD by mail.reliance.net
(SMTP32) id A01BC; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:56:19 -0700
Received: from siteserver3.reliance.net
Strangeness. I'm curious how this message manage to get through and be
delivered. I have weight20 set to hold and weight30 to delete. This
message made weight63. The address it was delievered to is granted
located on a unix box but the messages get relayed through imail and
obviously declude
Strangeness. I'm curious how this message manage to get through and be
delivered.
My first question: Do you have a WHITELIST entry that could have let it
through?
I have weight20 set to hold and weight30 to delete. This
message made weight63. The address it was delievered to is granted
I'm trying to setup the following tests for weight.
When I add the following (minus the # comment sign)
#SPAMHEADERSspamheaders x x 3 0
#NOABUSE noabuse x x 3 0
#NOPOSTMASTERnopostmasterx x 3 0
I get the
I'm trying to setup the following tests for weight.
When I add the following (minus the # comment sign)
#SPAMHEADERSspamheaders x x 3 0
#NOABUSE noabuse x x 3 0
#NOPOSTMASTERnopostmasterx x 3 0
I get the
Should the %WEIGHT% Variable work with the SUBJECT action in 1.35a or 1.36.
I know it works other places but when I tried it in the sbject action it
didn't work.
Thanks
Stu
-
CSOnline Technical Support hours - Monday
Should the %WEIGHT% Variable work with the SUBJECT action in 1.35a or 1.36.
I know it works other places but when I tried it in the sbject action it
didn't work.
It should work with 1.36, but was just added and has not been thoroughly
tested yet.
What happens when you try using it?
I used it with 1.35a
WEIGHT15SUBJECT Junkmail Wt:%WEIGHT%
(Yes the quotes are part of the subject tag line)
The result was exactly that
Junkmail Wt:%WEIGHT%Viagra is Great
Stu
At 04:06 PM 02/01/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Should the %WEIGHT% Variable work with the
I remember several announcements in the past two weeks (since the official
1.30 beta started), that there was going to be a fix in the respective next
day or two that would at least re-fix the weight test?
It's actually only been about a week -- the holidays seem to make it seem
longer. The
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight Fix? on Thursday 1:16:53 PM
We have not seen it error here. It adds 'em up and HOLDs all
exceeding the limit just fine. We basically set all switches to
WARN except WEIGHT10 and then we can see just how well each
combination of tests
58 matches
Mail list logo
