Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Darin Cox
passing the test. Darin. - Original Message - From: Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 12:25 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name I am seeing more and more I guess one would call throw-away domains like

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Mike K @ NetDotCom
Perhaps a test that looks at the date of registration so new domains could be weighted higher. Mike - Original Message - From: Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 12:25 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name I am

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, February 11, 2005, 8:51:46 AM, Darin wrote: DC Most of what slips through our filters is exactly this. Unfortunately I DC know of no way to block this short of reacting to the first one seen and DC adding a body filter for the URL...the same thing Message Sniffer or any DC SURBL list

Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Darin Cox
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 9:12 AM Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name On Friday, February 11, 2005, 8:51:46 AM, Darin wrote: DC Most of what slips through our filters is exactly this. Unfortunately I DC know of no way to block this short of reacting to the first one seen

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Nick
@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 12:25 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name I am seeing more and more I guess one would call throw-away domains like: .hdcnsowp.com .hcnmvkofut.com .eisopfkcnjt.com .edhcbxgsyi.com These are generally in the body of an email

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, February 11, 2005, 9:28:28 AM, Darin wrote: DC Hi Pete, DC Right... but the first few typically slip through before they're added to DC your filters (like they would for anyone)...so we add them on the first DC report to us as well. I'll raise the feature request again --- as soon as

RE: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
this: http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/ Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 6:49 AM To: Darin Cox Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name On Friday, February 11

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Matt
] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 6:49 AM To: Darin Cox Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name On Friday, February 11, 2005, 9:28:28 AM, Darin wrote: DC Hi Pete, DC Right... but the first few typically slip through before they're DC added to your filters (like

RE: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name On Friday, February 11, 2005, 9:28:28 AM, Darin wrote: DC Hi Pete, DC Right... but the first few typically slip through before they're DC added to your filters (like they would for anyone)...so we add them DC on the first report to us as well

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 10:55 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name I don't think that I am really interested in this personally, but you could probably fairly easily write

Re: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Mike K @ NetDotCom
To: Darin Cox Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name On Friday, February 11, 2005, 9:28:28 AM, Darin wrote: DC Hi Pete, DC Right... but the first few typically slip through before they're DC added to your filters (like they would for anyone)...so we add them DC on the first report to us

Re: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Darin Cox
. - Original Message - From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Darin Cox Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 9:49 AM Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name On Friday, February 11, 2005, 9:28:28 AM, Darin wrote: DC Hi Pete, DC Right... but the first few

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Darin Cox
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 9:46 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name On 11 Feb 2005 at 8:51, Darin Cox wrote: Hi Darin - Most of what slips through our filters is exactly this. Unfortunately I know of no way to block this short of reacting to the first one seen and adding

RE: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Markus Gufler
Subject: Re: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name Hmmm...some of our customers are constantly in contact with new personnel, even new businesses, that they work with in a consulting role. This absolutely would not work for them, as the delays would be unacceptable. In their case

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Nick
I am seeing more and more I guess one would call throw-away domains like: .hdcnsowp.com .hcnmvkofut.com .eisopfkcnjt.com .edhcbxgsyi.com These are generally in the body of an email; is there a way to determine if a domain is in readable format? I would not fail an email over this but it