Many of my users are personnel agencies that send and receive a lot of
resumes as attachments. Some of these attachments are fairly large.
I'm having a growing problem with processor usage. Does Declude scan
attachments? Is there a way to turn that off?
That shouldn't be an issue -- for example,
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments
Many of my users are personnel agencies that send and receive a lot of
resumes as attachments. Some of these attachments are fairly large.
I'm having a growing problem
: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments
Hi Scott-
When this happens, I usually see about three Declude processes, each in the
25% - 30% neighborhood, and several more showing smaller percentages. Also,
I see the usual Sniffer, SMTP
I use a filter that searches for attachments and causes the email to bypass
further filter tests. For example my filter is called BYPASS and contains
lines like these:
BODY 0 CONTAINS .PDF
BODY 0 CONTAINS Content-type: application/msword
BODY 0 CONTAINS Content-Type: application/pdf
BODY 0
When this happens, I usually see about three Declude processes, each in the
25% - 30% neighborhood, and several more showing smaller percentages. Also,
I see the usual Sniffer, SMTP, POP, and IMAP, all much lower.
Do you have a lot of BODY or ANYWHERE filters (the most CPU intensive tests
in
OK, it,s in place. Let's see what happens. Thanks!
-d
- Original Message -
From: Rick Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments
I use a filter that searches for attachments
. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments
Many of my users are personnel agencies that send and receive a lot of
resumes as attachments. Some of these attachments are fairly large.
I'm
I have one BODY filter that is about 7K in size maybe 200 lines. That's it.
-d
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments
When this happens, I
One instance of Declude, then two, then three, all in the 25%+ range. As
soon as it dropped to two Decludes, Queue Manager came right in at 30-40%,
then the cycles dropped as QueueManager dropped down.
It does sound like it is the large files that are causing the problem.
One option would be to
OK, the BODY filter is off.
If the problem continues, I'll set the log level to debug and turn the
filter back on.
-Dave
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude
Scott,
I've got a lot more BODY filters than Dave has, though I don't feel that
they are excessive. I probably have about 1,500 BODY searches, but with
SKIPIFWEIGHT they only run about 25% of the time.
If Dave is using Declude Virus, I would also look there for the issue.
Anything besides
, June 17, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments
Scott,
I've got a lot more BODY filters than Dave has, though I don't feel that
they are excessive. I probably have about 1,500 BODY searches, but with
SKIPIFWEIGHT they only run about 25% of the time.
If Dave
Matt-
My body filters only catch about 4% of messages, but I don't know how often
they are run. Is htere a convenient way to tell?
-d
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude
-
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments
Scott,
I've got a lot more BODY filters than Dave has, though I don't feel that
they are excessive. I probably have about 1,500 BODY searches
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message -
From: Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments
I haven't found any easy way to tell. The information is in the logs at high
level
to tell?
-d
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments
Scott,
I've got a lot more BODY filters than Dave has, though I don't feel that
they are excessive. I
a convenient way to tell?
-d
- Original Message -
From: "Matt" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments
Scott,
I've got a lot more BODY filters than Dave has, though I
17 matches
Mail list logo
