I really enjoyed the Earthlink Challenge-Response
when my own e-mail address was forged by some spammers a couple of months ago.
I'd get about a dozen Challenge-Responses a day out of Earthlink.
- Original Message -
From:
Darin Cox
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Title: Message
Darin,
what's
the problem? As long as Challenge/Response messages originate from
"" (the null sender) it wouldn't matter if two majorISPs do
it.
They
key is:
a)
have a weighting system in place so that only "questionable mail" is challenged
to cut down on overhead
b)
Ouch!
Ok, so I'm a little behind the times...just hadn't
seen any in the hold queue before now.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Scott
Fisher
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now using
challenge
15, 2005 10:30 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now using
challenge-response
Darin,
what's
the problem? As long as Challenge/Response messages originate from
"" (the null sender) it wouldn't matter if two majorISPs do
it.
They
key is:
a)
have a weighting system i
Title: Message
Andy Schmidt wrote:
The lack of a properly implemented
challenge/response mechanism for Imail/Declude (for those who like to
implement it) has always been a disadvantage.
Ugg. Virtually every C/R that my server receives is associated with
spam and it is very
Title: Message
If I could I would bounce their C/R so it never get to us. I
tried it once and it got us in a loop with another ISP's C/R
Yes, that's Declude's fault as much as it
is an unacceptable C/R implementation. NEITHER should be sending notices
from anything but NULL. If at least
Title: Message
IMail won't let Declude send as . That's the problem.
Matt
Andy Schmidt wrote:
If I could I would bounce their C/R so
it never get to us. I tried it once and it got us in a loop with
another ISP's C/R
Yes, that's
Declude's fault as much as it is an
Title: Message
IMail won't
let Declude send as . That's the
problem.
Almost. The problem is that Declude stillCHOOSES to use
theImail1.exe command line application, even though it clearly is
unsuitable for the task.
Instead,they should allow us to configure which command
line
, 2005 8:57
AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE:
[Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now using challenge-response
IMail won't
let Declude send as . That's the
problem.
Almost. The problem is that Declude stillCHOOSES to use
theImail1.exe command line application, even though
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 11:45 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink now using
challenge-response
IMail won't let Declude send
10 matches
Mail list logo
