> >So I'm neither able to disable only outgoing warnings.
>
> Have you tried my suggestion? :)
No.
We've had the same problem with 5 other clients sending messages to
users on the ISP inode.at
Adding per domain configigurations to this 5 domains will not prevent
that other clients (domains) will
s Gufler
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: Exim error message (X-RBL-Warning..)
> In this case, since they don't seem to care *which* spam
> tests fail (the
> fact that you use an X-RBL-Warning: header rather than
> b
I can't follow:
The default- and per Domain configuration is used to process incoming
mail for this specific domain.
But the Exim Mail server bounce our messages with the outgoing
X-RBL-Warnings from declude.
As I know only the pro version handle the outgoing actions set in the
global.cfg
So I'm
> In this case, since they don't seem to care *which* spam
> tests fail (the
> fact that you use an X-RBL-Warning: header rather than
> blocking the E-mail
> typically indicates that the test doesn't justify blocking
> the E-mail), I
> would recommend using a trick to allow you to keep the
Because since we use SPAMCHK there was also some bounced messages from
Exim indicating the casue of the error
"forced faulure: SPAMCHK ..."
I'm sure Exim bounce our messages because there are the "X-RBL-Warning:
" lines in the header.
Talk about a "poor man's spam filter" -- relying o
