Re: [Declude.JunkMail] General Filter

2005-09-01 Thread Orin Wells
@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 4:35 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] General Filter At 12:29 PM 8/31/2005, Dave Beckstrom wrote: Aren't they authenticating to Imail, and aren't you white listing authenticated senders? Wellthat is another issue we are finally being forced

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] General Filter

2005-09-01 Thread Scott Fisher
You might consider putting a space after the short words in your body filters. - Original Message - From: Orin Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 2:10 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] General Filter I am having a problem with a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] General Filter

2005-08-31 Thread David Barker
You could try adding the following or something similar at the beginning of your filter BODYEND CONTAINSContent-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Or instead of END a -10 depending n the values in your filter. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] General Filter

2005-08-31 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
BODY filters are generally the LAST test you want to rely on for several reasons, including problems with encoding (such as you are witnessing) and resources used. However, what concerns me is why are any actions being taken on messages sent from one person in a domain to another person in the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] General Filter

2005-08-31 Thread Matt
Orin, Declude unfortunately scans the entire undecoded message with BODY or ANYWHERE filters. Because base64 encoding uses mostly letters and numbers, larger attachments can hit shorter words such as the one you pointed out. As a rule of thumb, you should add a space to the end of the word in

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] General Filter

2005-08-31 Thread Dave Beckstrom
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] General Filter BODY filters are generally the LAST test you want to rely on for several reasons, including problems with encoding (such as you are witnessing) and resources used. However, what concerns me is why are any actions being

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] General Filter

2005-08-31 Thread Orin Wells
At 12:29 PM 8/31/2005, Dave Beckstrom wrote: Aren't they authenticating to Imail, and aren't you white listing authenticated senders? Wellthat is another issue we are finally being forced to address. In the first place we are still running iMail 7.07 - we weren't willing to pay what I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] General Filter

2005-08-31 Thread Dave Doherty
- Original Message - From: Orin Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 4:35 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] General Filter At 12:29 PM 8/31/2005, Dave Beckstrom wrote: Aren't they authenticating to Imail, and aren't you white