RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New and old locations of Q files while being processed

2005-10-04 Thread John T \(Lists\)
I understand that in Declude 2.x and lower Declude will rename the Q file by replacing the leading Q with an underscore, and the extension has it's first letter replaced with a tilde. Am I correct in assuming that when 2.x and below moves a Q file into Overflow, that it repeats this same

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New and old locations of Q files while being processed - SpamReview?

2005-10-04 Thread Nick Hayer
John, [or others ] I use SpamReview to review held email. How does this fit now into the mix with 3x Declude? I presume SpamReview will dump the 'return to queue' files back into the /spool dir. Is this ok? -Nick John T (Lists) wrote: I understand that in Declude 2.x and lower

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New and old locations of Q files while being processed - SpamReview?

2005-10-04 Thread John T \(Lists\)
: [Declude.JunkMail] New and old locations of Q files while being processed - SpamReview? John, [or others ] I use SpamReview to review held email. How does this fit now into the mix with 3x Declude? I presume SpamReview will dump the 'return to queue' files back into the /spool dir. Is this ok? -Nick

re: [Declude.JunkMail] New and old locations of Q files while being processed

2005-10-03 Thread Gary Steiner
I'm confused by the SmarterMail reference. I thought the Q naming convention was unique to IMail. I'm using SmarterMail 2.6, and the only names I've seen have been *.EML and *.HDR files. Did an older version of SmarterMail use Q files? The only renaming I've seen is a switch between

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New and old locations of Q files while being processed

2005-10-03 Thread Matt
Sorry. The "Q" reference was just a generic reference to the file that contains the extra information from the SMTP session. This is just the IMail in me speaking. Matt Gary Steiner wrote: I'm confused by the SmarterMail reference. I thought the Q naming convention was unique to IMail.