RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with SpamCop?

2003-09-24 Thread Keith Anderson
I've always had problems with Spamcop and excessive false positives. It works best when weighted high, but not high enough to trigger as spam by itself. Combined with other test, it works great. Is it me, or did SpamCop suddenly become awful when it comes to false positives with almost

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with SpamCop?

2003-09-24 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
This comes up every few months. For some reason, it appears SpamCop goes through a mean period and starts listing servers quickly. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with SpamCop?

2003-09-24 Thread Chuck Schick
The major problem we have seen is that Spamcop is listing many aol ip addresses. This has been going on for about 3 weeks now. Most aol mail is now getting held because they fail 3 tests. We are considering lowering the weight on Spam Cop. I would assume with all of the aol Volume that their

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with SpamCop?

2003-09-24 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Well, it's important to remember that SpamCop is user-driven. The man behind it, Julian Haight, and his Spam Cop deputies focus on parsing the messages well, holding off the DoS attacks, juggling the expiry and the weight of the IP subnet based on reports, and getting the right abuse addresses

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with SpamCop?

2003-09-24 Thread Jeff Kratka
Over the last couple of weeks I have gotten a couple of messages from Spamcop about problems. Looking at logs and some other things nothing went out from my IP range. I will probably drop the weight on Spamcop for a while until things settle down. Jeff Kratka

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with SpamCop?

2003-09-24 Thread Matthew Bramble
Any possibility of sharing those messages here? Matt Jeff Kratka wrote: Over the last couple of weeks I have gotten a couple of messages from Spamcop about problems. Looking at logs and some other things nothing went out from my IP range. I will probably drop the weight on Spamcop for a while

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with SpamCop?

2003-09-24 Thread Chuck Schick
: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:12 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with SpamCop? Well, it's important to remember that SpamCop is user-driven. The man behind it, Julian Haight, and his Spam Cop deputies focus on parsing the messages well, holding off

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with SpamCop?

2003-09-24 Thread Matthew Bramble
I think the design of the system is both brilliant and flawed at the same time. There aren't enough checks and balances in place to keep the system pure. One night when PayPal sent out a notice to users, SpamCop started listing them. I checked their records and found that they had 6