RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List: Related to Anyone know a tool...

2008-11-12 Thread David Barker
This is how the Mailbox action should work. The MAILBOX action will send an E-mail to a specific mailbox (folder) for the recipient. For example, you can have E-mail moved to a spam mailbox that the user can check via web messaging or IMAP (or POP3, by setting up a special account in the format

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-)

2003-05-29 Thread David Sullivan
Does anyone that doesn't agree with Bill have any suggestions? We've got an Imail server on a Dell box (2650 2.2 Xeon, RAID 1/5, etc) doing about 150,000 messages a day at roughly 45% utilization and climbing. Looking at all the headaches of managing another box along with duplicate purchases of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-)

2003-05-29 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
, Systems Network Engineer -Original Message- From: David Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-) Does anyone that doesn't agree with Bill have any suggestions? We've got

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-)

2003-05-29 Thread Omar K.
, May 28, 2003 4:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-) This is precisely what we do, although not to the tune of 150k messages a day. Imail and Declude make an AWESOME gateway mail server. Only when external contact is required ( in or out ) do we

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-)

2003-05-29 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Does anyone that doesn't agree with Bill have any suggestions? Scott, I'm just wondering what your thoughts are on these proposed changes? FWIW, I have been extremely busy so far this week. I am in the midst of a 3 day Windows Server 2003 training class. Therefore, I have not been able to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-)

2003-05-27 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Scott, with talk recently of optimization and efficiency, and where certain tests should be conducted to save on CPU cycles. I was thinking that one way to gain efficiency would be to NOT run Declude and third-party apps (SpamChk, AlliGate/SpamManager, Sniffer, etc.) on whitelisted e-mails

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-)

2003-05-27 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 6:53 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-) Scott, with talk recently of optimization and efficiency, and where certain tests should

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List

2002-05-21 Thread John Shacklett
Tom, what is the format for the filters? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 5:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List I'm already doing this. I have a program

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List

2002-05-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
Would it not be great if we could assign an e-Mail or a number of e-Mails that if someone sends a message to they will automatically get blacklisted? This would immediately save all the junk they will manage to send through. It is a good idea. The question though is what to block -- the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List

2002-05-20 Thread Kami Razvan
Regards, Kami -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 5:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List Would it not be great if we could assign an e-Mail or a number of e-Mails

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List

2002-05-20 Thread Tom Schwarz
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List Would it not be great if we could assign an e-Mail or a number of e-Mails that if someone sends a message to they will automatically get blacklisted? This would immediately save all the junk they will manage to send through

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List

2002-05-20 Thread David Stavert
Add away. Thanks David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 4:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List I'm already doing this. I have a program on the server that runs

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List

2002-05-20 Thread Tom Schwarz
] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List Importance: Low Add away. Thanks David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 4:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List I'm already doing

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List

2002-05-20 Thread David Stavert
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List David, Only if it were that easy. I'll toss it into the next major release. ? Do you use the Out

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List

2002-05-20 Thread Tom Schwarz
No, I am talking about the Out of Office feature in SpamReview. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Stavert Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 8:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List Importance: Low Tom

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List

2002-05-20 Thread Eje Gustafsson
, 2002 6:44 PM TS To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TS Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List TS Importance: Low TS Add away. TS Thanks TS David TS -Original Message- TS From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz TS Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 4:24 PM TS To: [EMAIL