passing the
test.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name
I am seeing more and more I guess one would call throw-away domains
like
Perhaps a test that looks at the date of registration so new domains could
be weighted higher.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 12:25
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name
I am
@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name
I am seeing more and more I guess one would call throw-away domains
like:
.hdcnsowp.com
.hcnmvkofut.com
.eisopfkcnjt.com
.edhcbxgsyi.com
These are generally in the body of an email
] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 6:49 AM
To: Darin Cox
Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name
On Friday, February 11, 2005, 9:28:28 AM, Darin wrote:
DC Hi Pete,
DC Right... but the first few typically slip through before they're
DC added to your filters (like
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 10:55 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name
I don't think that I am really interested in this personally, but you
could probably fairly easily write
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name
On 11 Feb 2005 at 8:51, Darin Cox wrote:
Hi Darin -
Most of what slips through our filters is exactly this. Unfortunately
I know of no way to block this short of reacting to the first one seen
and adding
I am seeing more and more I guess one would call throw-away domains
like:
.hdcnsowp.com
.hcnmvkofut.com
.eisopfkcnjt.com
.edhcbxgsyi.com
These are generally in the body of an email; is there a way to
determine if a domain is in readable format? I would not fail an
email over this but it