RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration

2006-11-08 Thread Todd Richards
utility!). Thanks! Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 6:19 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration Unless, as some prefer, you want to mark

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration

2006-11-07 Thread John T \(Lists\)
What I do is send those grey ones to HOLD and then use fpReview to directly view them and take appropriate action. Much faster and easier than using a mailbox. John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882)

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration

2006-11-07 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Look at using weightrange instead of weight to define your weighted tests. It simplifies the weighting and makes it clear on what will happen to the message. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Richards Sent: Tuesday,

re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration

2006-11-07 Thread Gary Steiner
Is it because when it reaches WEIGHT19 and does the ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED], the message is delivered? Then when it tries to perform the action of WEIGHT32 the message is already gone? Does Declude allow for multiple instances of the same action where subsequent actions are performed, or

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration

2006-11-07 Thread Todd Richards
: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:34 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration Is it because when it reaches WEIGHT19 and does the ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED], the message is delivered? Then when it tries to perform the action of WEIGHT32 the message

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration

2006-11-07 Thread Todd Richards
: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration What I do is send those grey ones to HOLD and then use fpReview to directly view them and take appropriate action. Much faster and easier than using a mailbox. John T eServices For You Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Ralph

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration

2006-11-07 Thread Todd Richards
: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration Look at using weightrange instead of weight to define your weighted tests. It simplifies the weighting and makes it clear on what will happen to the message. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration

2006-11-07 Thread Nick Hayer
: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration Look at using "weightrange" instead of weight to define your weighted tests. It simplifies the weighting and makes it clear on what will happen to the message. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration

2006-11-07 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Of Todd Richards Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 2:50 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration Thanks Kevin. This is what I was wondering about, so I will look into how to implement. Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration

2006-11-07 Thread Darin Cox
, November 07, 2006 2:58 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration Look at using weightrange instead of weight to define your weighted tests. It simplifies the weighting and makes it clear on what will happen to the message. Kevin Bilbee -Original

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration

2006-11-07 Thread Kevin Bilbee
: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:13 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with Configuration Todd Richards wrote: Thanks Kevin.  This is what I was wondering about, so I will look into howto implement.  something like this: WEIGHTRANGE.SPAM.LOW weightrange x