Re: [Declude.JunkMail] time-dependently hold weight

2003-06-29 Thread Dan Patnode
file. Have fun! Bill - Original Message - From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 1:17 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] time-dependently hold weight I've considered this a few times, every time I prepare to suggest it I remember

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] time-dependently hold weight

2003-06-29 Thread Markus Gufler
Okay, here is a small contribution to the list. Wow! I printed it out and hung it up near to my PC. :-) Thanks! Would something written in php be as strong/fast? Dan, This compiled unixtools are _very_ fast. Much faster then any script engine. Markus --- [This E-mail was scanned for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] time-dependently hold weight

2003-06-29 Thread Bill Landry
list and I will send it to you. Bill - Original Message - From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 2:28 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] time-dependently hold weight Okay, here is a small contribution to the list. Wow! I printed

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] time-dependently hold weight

2003-06-28 Thread Markus Gufler
Go to sleep Markus. It has been too long of a week to think. Was it really 2:15AM GMT+1 when I sent this message? ;-) Have a nice weekend! Markus --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] time-dependently hold weight

2003-06-28 Thread Markus Gufler
I've considered this a few times, every time I prepare to suggest it I remember what happened with my idea to test for long subjects, there just isn't enough uniformity. Well. Maybe my idea is expressed from the wrong side. Watching the diagram I can also simply fathom that my current hold

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] time-dependently hold weight

2003-06-28 Thread Bill Landry
Linux machines, where I can run the same script on any size log file. Have fun! Bill - Original Message - From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 1:17 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] time-dependently hold weight I've considered

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] time-dependently hold weight

2003-06-27 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Title: Nachricht Go to sleep Markus. It has been too long of a week to think. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] time-dependently hold weight

2003-06-27 Thread Dan Patnode
Its been a horrible week, but I need the distraction... I've considered this a few times, every time I prepare to suggest it I remember what happened with my idea to test for long subjects, there just isn't enough uniformity. My concern isn't so much uniformity of technical things like