Here is a preliminary list, not all have been verified and several are
currently being worked on: (Note these does not include Declude adds for new
functionality) Email me if you are aware of a known issue that is not on
this list.
*Line Terminator Problem
*Auto whitelist Imail 2006
*Reported
John T,
The Auto whitelist IMail 2006 is the issue I was referring to a few days ago
in regards to wanting users that SMTP AUTH to be whitelisted. Were you were
saying that this was working with 2006 and Declude 4.x?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMail changed their addressbook from text files to a database in 2006
currently Declude does not read the databse.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:44 AM
To:
Ahh, so I was correct. SMTP AUTH is still an issue. That in itself is a
showstopper for us to move to IMail 2006 and Declude 4.x
How soon until Declude will read this and auto whitelist, David? IMail 2006
was released a year ago.
The following from your list are showstoppers for us to
The Auto whitelist IMail 2006 is the issue I was referring to a few days
ago
in regards to wanting users that SMTP AUTH to be whitelisted. Were you
were
saying that this was working with 2006 and Declude 4.x?
WHITELIST AUTH line in the Global.cfg is working as expected.
The Auto Whitelist
Darin,
Many of these issues exist in your current version, upgrading is not going
to make things worse, other than perhaps the Imail addressbook 2006.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006
Ahh... you're right. I was mixing the two issues together. Both are issues
for us, though.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 11:35 AM
Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE:
Hi David,
What's the ETA on the address book issue? As I mentioned IMail 2006 was
released a year ago. Many of our customers use the whitelist address book
feature currently, so we cannot upgrade if that means losing that feature.
Also, I don't believe most of these issues exist in 1.82 or
Darin, let me put it plainly.
If you put WHITELIST AUTH line in the Global.cfg file any user the sends
out through your server via smtp and who authenticates to the server will be
Whitelisted.
In other words, SMTP AUTH whitelisting is and has been working. I have
provided clear proof and others
Right. I responded in another email that I was mistakenly mixing the two
issues thinking one thing and saying another...
Sorry for the confusion.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006
So does the NONSTANDARDHDR vulnerability test protect us from both of these
problems?
Mark Reimer
IT System Admin
American CareSource
972-308-6887
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:23 PM
To:
Hi Mark,
Yes to a certain extent we are checking for no standard line terminators,
however this problem is more evasive and requires additional functionality
to correct.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
Reimer
Sent: Tuesday,
Just curious. Are many people using Michael's RFC violations test? If so how
is it working out?
Mark Reimer
IT System Admin
American CareSource
972-308-6887
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006
David Barker, Can you tell us the status of this old case? What progress
has been made on this seemingly critical issue?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:09 AM
Subject: RE:
Darin,
Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to
standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator
issue. As there are several other things he is working on I do not have a
definitive release date for this, I am looking at moving around some
Thanks, David. We appreciate your input.
Is it feasible to post a list of known issues and/or issues being worked? I
realize that's a lot of disclosure, and would probably increase call volume
significantly, but I also know that would make me feel much more comfortable
of someday being able to
I will see what I can do to bring together a list of known issues. Just give
me some time (days) and I will get it posted.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:19 AM
To:
Thanks, David. We appreciate your efforts.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:26 AM
Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: On RFC Violation -
Declude allows attachments and
David,
Thanks to both you and the other Dave for taking another look at this.
Matt
David Barker wrote:
Darin,
Our engineer Dave Franco is looking at a way to rewrite every message to
standardize the format in order to overcome the incorrect line terminator
issue. As there are several other
Hi All,
I said in my original email that Declude had been notified of LF only issue.
I just looked back through my email and found the report. It was Declude
case [06D-0BBF1866-F5A3] on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:29:58 -0500.
Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-683-6718
1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)
---
This
20 matches
Mail list logo
