Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter file maintenance suggestion

2004-10-07 Thread Nick Hayer
On 6 Oct 2004 at 18:52, Sanford Whiteman wrote: [ Don't worry, I'll cool off the cheerleading the moment a lot of SPAMC32 support posts come in. :) ] Cheers and more cheers from me. Simply Excellent! -Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter file maintenance suggestion

2004-10-07 Thread David Sullivan
Hello Matt, M What number would turning off individual vulnerabilities in Declude M Virus get on your list? M :) or per domain control of this feature? #1 Biggest problem is vulnerabilities caught from TigerDirect receipts and United Airlines confirmations. -- Best regards, David

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter file maintenance suggestion

2004-10-06 Thread Sanford Whiteman
So is URIBL_JP_SURBL supposed to be in our Global file..because I dont have it.. URIBL_JP_SURBL is the default name of the SpamAssassin rule corresponding to Joe's zone. AFAIK, it's the only zone directly provided by SURBL that is _not_ activated by default in SA 3.0. I am

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter file maintenance suggestion

2004-10-06 Thread Sanford Whiteman
In the mean time, you can always setup a Linux mail gateway and use SpamAssassin, or use the Win32 version of SpamAssassin with DJM (see Sandy Whiteman's e-mail signature). Or both! You can run the SPAMD daemon on any platform, but have SPAMC32 query it from Declude Junkmail. Running

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter file maintenance suggestion

2004-10-06 Thread Keith Johnson
? Thanks for the aid. Keith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Wed 10/6/2004 6:52 PM To: Bill Landry Cc: Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter file maintenance suggestion