Has anyone seen anything about this .. Any good or bad ? .. Bayesian
filtering .. Check this link http://www.paulgraham.com/filters.html
Scott are you thinking along any of these line for the future of
Declude?
Here's part of an E-mail that I posted previously:
---
The concept is flawed, but
Anecdotally this makes a lot of sense. It was primarily porn spam that
caused us to move our filterchain module development forward in the sniffer
program.
_M
]-Original Message-
]From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
]Sent: Monday, September 23,
What's a good rule or configuration that people have used for Yahoo. Seems Yahoo ( at
least groups ) fails the abuse test when they do have an abuse account.
I've been testing out the junkmail and went hog wild and well you can't please
everyone all the time.
--
Avolve Support
740 467 3338
--
Ok I got an extra of the email I sent to the list with subject line modified and one
without. Hmm. Wonder if I'll get a second of this one.
-- Original Message --
From: Avolve Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 23 Sep
Hello,
I try to play Junkmail, but it won't work.
we host some websites, and they are sending mail over our primary
mailserver.
If the website uses ASPMail, the mail will fail because of
Code: 420f. The E-mail failed the SPAMHEADERS test.
This E-mail is missing a Message-ID: header.
If the website uses ASPMail, the mail will fail because of
Code: 420f. The E-mail failed the SPAMHEADERS test.
This E-mail is missing a Message-ID: header.
For this, you should upgrade ASPMail to the latest version (or ask them
what the good reason is for not having the Message-ID:
And if I use another tool, the webserver itself has no reverse lookup
and no MX entry.
It does not need this, because it will only send mail.
But why not eliminate one test failure and create a PTR record for it?
Is it really useful to whitelist all my addresses?
Unless some one else can come
I agree, but our commerce server seems to be having a problem resolving
domains, so until I have the time to figure that problem out, I am
having our mail server deliver the messages.
PS, Declude Queue does help.
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA
Hello Scott,
For this, you should upgrade ASPMail to the latest version
(or ask them what the good reason is for not having the Message-ID:
header).
it is the latest version ;-/ I'll try to ask them.
Do you realize that all the servers using WTMail are sending
mail that many mail clients
Note that there is a LOOSENSPAMHEADERS ON option you can
use to get the SPAMHEADERS test not to check for the Message-ID: header.
However, this will only prevent the E-mail from failing the test on your
server, not other servers. :)
does IMail/Declude give the mail a valid Message-ID?
Hello John,
And if I use another tool, the webserver itself has no reverse lookup
and no MX entry. It does not need this, because it will only send mail.
But why not eliminate one test failure and create a PTR record for it?
We are only forwarding the mail from the webserver to IMail, and
Well you are not taking into account systems like mine, which have a setup
like
HOP 0
HOPHIGH 4
Yes it adds CPU time, but any IP the message passes through gets tested on
my system,
And a PTR record does not take long to configure at all.
on the Webserver. If your Webserver is IIS, why not
-diag response says that
Declude Junkmail: Config file not found (M:\imail\Declude\global.CFG).
Global.cfg is there and declude appears to be functioning just fine
That is unusual.
Is that the correct location (M:\imail\Declude\global.cfg)? Is the file
named *exactly* like that (no
DOH!
What the heck was I looking at... You are correct. There is NOT a NOT!
I should have stayed on vacation!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Sniffer logfile shows nothing but matches (example below). Have not
seen a clean entry since the upgrade today.
sniffer 20020923165941 D4876000800deda6b.SMD 60 0 Match
10222 46 0 0 5
sniffer 20020923170147 D48f8000900ded796.SMD 60 0 Match
10222
This rule 10222 should match only a specific email address... however
the scan index and ended are both z which is not possible.
It is likley you have a corrupted .snf file.
Hope this helps,
_M
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
And I like to have only one logfile to search for errors ;)
Good point.
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the
I was wondering if someone could post the filter types and definitions.
For example, I found these and I'm sure there are more.
BODY10 CONTAINSif the Body contains a word or phrase
HELO10 CONTAINSif the HELO command contains a word or phrase
I was wondering if someone could post the filter types and definitions.
For example, I found these and I'm sure there are more.
BODY10 CONTAINSif the Body contains a word or phrase
HELO10 CONTAINSif the HELO command contains a
word or phrase
Would it be possible to add CONTAINSWORD so white wouldn't be caught?
Obviously, I understand it complicates things because you have to deal
with things like hi. Perhaps you can just search for the word
surrounded by non-letters and numbers.
Just a thought.
Jerod M. Bennett
Director of Media
Would it be possible to add CONTAINSWORD so white wouldn't be caught?
It is unlikely that that would get added. The problem is that it adds a
significant amount of extra processing time (especially when the headers or
the body of the E-mail is scanned), and requires coming up with a way to
Don't forget HEADERS!
I don't see it in the manual, but it was added and I am using it
:)
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter types and Definitions?
How does one go about creating a negative weight
for the following CFG example:
---
WLIST fromfiled:\imail\declude\allowed.txtx 0 0
I searched the mail archive and found this example for the BASE64 test
definition
BASE64 base64 x x 4 0
I have two questions
1) Is this the correct format?
2) Does this test only fail on messages with
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
It is my
I searched the mail archive and found this example for the
BASE64 test definition
BASE64 base64x x 4 0
BASE64 base64 x x 4 0
Looks correct.
2) Does this test only fail on messages with
Content-Type: text/html
Will this test work for outgoing mail as well?
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BASE64 test
I searched the mail archive and found
Does anyone have custom .asp code to allow customers to set some of their
own Declude pro settings?
Thank you,
Zachery Wolfinger
Director of IT/IS - Galaxy Holdings, Inc.
888-758-3910
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ#: 28221108
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system
I created a list of countries and found that Declude is
not working the way I thought it should. Declude checks
the entire string for a match instead of just the tail
end. I was under the impression that it examined the
addresses from the tail end and not the beginning.
So if I had .ru, then
I searched the mail archive and found this example for the BASE64 test
definition
BASE64 base64 x x 4 0
I have two questions
1) Is this the correct format?
Yes, it is. This is a beta feature that is available in v1.60 and higher.
2) Does this test only fail on messages
I would love to find some as well!
--
Thanks,
Aaron
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VanTech.Net
www.vantech.net
Phone 559.732.3952
Fax 559.732.1509
6707 W. Goshen Avenue
Visalia, CA 93291
Monday, September 23, 2002, 3:00:32 PM, you wrote:
ZW Does anyone have
How does one go about creating a negative weight
for the following CFG example:
---
WLIST fromfiled:\imail\declude\allowed.txtx 0
0
Don't forget HEADERS!
I don't see it in the manual, but it was added and I am using it
Thanks -- it's in the manual now. I don't know how that one got overlooked...
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
I created a list of countries and found that Declude is
not working the way I thought it should. Declude checks
the entire string for a match instead of just the tail
end. I was under the impression that it examined the
addresses from the tail end and not the beginning.
So if I had .ru, then
Seems Yahoo (at least groups) fails the abuse test when they do have
an abuse account.
yahoogroups.com should not fail, but yahoo.com proper (pardon the
expression) should fail NOABUSE (they attempt to route people to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], which is all well and good, but non-RFC). If
Negative weight can (unfortunately) mean two different things.
You can have:
Assuming that this is a whitelist, you would want the first type
(-1000 0).
Thanks.
Tom
Image`fx
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone would like to share their filter list, as I am
working on mine right now. I only have about 20 filters in place right that
are working great, but there are so many ways/options. Here are the filters
I am looking for:
SUBJECT
BODY
HEADERS
HELO
MAILFROM
REMOTEIP
One of our client's got locked out by HiJack (hold2), but it appears to be because of
inbound mail, not outgoing mail. This client has an email account at another provider
which forwards to an account on our server. He had a few hundred emails from an
automated program sent to his other
Why is this IP failing Spamcop?
http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?162.42.150.35
The link says it falls below the threshold and shouldn't be listed.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=162.42.150.35
Shows listed in MAILDEFLECTOR and POSTFIXGATE.
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
39 matches
Mail list logo
