[Declude.JunkMail] Filtering on a header

When you are attempting to filter on a header for example this header X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business Would the following line in my filter file work HEADERS 10 CONTAINS X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business Or should I use HEADERS 10 IS X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business Is

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering on a header

When you are attempting to filter on a header for example this header X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business Would the following line in my filter file work HEADERS 10 CONTAINS X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business Or should I use HEADERS 10 IS X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business Is

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering on a header

When you are attempting to filter on a header for example this header X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business Only the first one will work. The key here is that Declude JunkMail is looking at the *entire* headers (it isn't going through each one, line-by-line). So IS would only work if

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering on a header

Here's the weights we use: HEADERS 2 CONTAINS PowerMTA(TM) HEADERS 5 CONTAINS KUNBrun SMTP Receiver HEADERS 5 CONTAINS Synapse - Delphi HEADERS 3 CONTAINS The Bat! HEADERS 5 CONTAINS SmartMax MailMax HEADERS 5 CONTAINS eGroups Message Poster HEADERS 5 CONTAINS X-Mailer: FoxMail HEADERS 9

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Tuning Declude

Scott, But I guess the obvious question is why did the SPAMHEADERS return the lookup code [c040400f]? Darrell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 3:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering on a header

Does anyone have a list or a similar resource to peruse. Darrell LaRock -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering on a header

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Tuning Declude

But I guess the obvious question is why did the SPAMHEADERS return the lookup code [c040400f]? Because that is the code. G That code indicates that the E-mail failed both the BADHEADERS and SPAMHEADERS tests, due to the broken Date: header and the large number of consecutive spaces in the

[Declude.JunkMail] Tricky Fix

Hello, All, If you've followed any of my previous postings you'll know that I've been using [EMAIL PROTECTED] as my COPYTO address to analyze what Declude.JunkMail was recognizing as spam on our system. That worked fine when I was analyzing the nexustechgroup.com domain. I used that to isolate

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Tuning Declude

Is it possible then to have the tool on the website updated to reflect the information you provided below? i.e. BADHEADERS - Broken or missing date SPAMHEADERS - consecutive spaces in the subject I am sorry to beat this to death, it's just that when you use the tool it gives the perception that

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Tuning Declude

Is it possible then to have the tool on the website updated to reflect the information you provided below? i.e. BADHEADERS - Broken or missing date SPAMHEADERS - consecutive spaces in the subject No. I am sorry to beat this to death, it's just that when you use the tool it gives the

[Declude.JunkMail] OSSOFT and False Positives

Hello, All, Is it possible for the OSSOFT test to generate False Positives? Or maybe a better way to say it has anyone ever had issues with False Positives generated for a message that failed the OSSOFT test? Thanks In Advance, Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Declude.JunkMail] newbie getting better, question about this header

So, here is a header from a msg from our friends at the BSA. (Don't worry, it'sa IP-panel invite) My domain is aiga.org BTW. My question is, given the fact that this msg is legit, the number of warnings/failures is pretty big. What do I do to communicate to this sender's postmaster that

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] newbie getting better, question about this header

Hi, All, How do I get this helpfulinformation to display in my headers? What configuration changes do I need to make? Thanks, Dan - Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:13 PM Subject: RE:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] newbie getting better, answer still needed

Ok, so I know the failures, but how can I set declude to send a msg to legit senders' postmasters or admins to let them know, hey we got your msg, but you need to make some fixes in order to become spam proofetc any suggestions? Steve __ Steve Jensen VP

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] newbie getting better, answer stillneeded

Ok, so I know the failures, but how can I set declude to send a msg to legit senders' postmasters or admins to let them know, hey we got your msg, but you need to make some fixes in order to become spam proofetc That becomes very tricky -- instead of separating mail into spam and