Scott, But I guess the obvious question is why did the SPAMHEADERS return the lookup code [c040400f]?
Darrell -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 3:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Tuning Declude >Here's an example of one a message that failed both: > >X-RBL-Warning: BADHEADERS: This E-mail was sent from a broken mail client >[c040400f]. >X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam >[c040400f] In this case, the E-mail failed the BADHEADERS test because of the bogus Date: header, but failed the SPAMHEADERS test because the headers contained a lot of consecutive blank spaces (such as "Hi! -qeurx"). -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
