Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail

2005-09-04 Thread Darin Cox
Too funny! I thought I had heard more success than that with 2.0.6. I forgot that the 3.0 version for SmarterMail wasn't quite out yet. Can any other Declude/SmarterMail users comment on their success, and what they did to achieve it? It might be worth posting your config here in case someone

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail

2005-09-04 Thread Dave Beckstrom
Darin, Here are a couple of things I found. A few minutes ago, I set log level to DEBUG so that I could show you the problems, and I changed my WIEGHT30 from a value of WEIGHT30 SUBJECT [SPAM] to WEIGHT30 HOLD %DATE% to enable holding of spam. Here is a log snippet with HOLD in effect:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail - Folder Names

2005-09-04 Thread Michael Jaworski
On the subject of folder names. Second the vote on no spacxes in file or folder names. Might it be better to use a simple format of 20050905 or 050905?? Also consider the issue of moving into a new year and the visual order of the folders when sorting by file name. This coming from using a GUI

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail

2005-09-04 Thread Darin Cox
For us it takes about an hour a day of tweaks with very few complaints, and is well worth it for the additional revenue it brings in which is not to say that at some point in the future it might work better to outsource. We're positioned in the market as outsourcees rather than outsourcers,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail - Folder Names

2005-09-04 Thread Darin Cox
Totally agree that MMDD works better for date-stamped directory names...especially if you're sorting. Good points about the bugs in not quoting directory names with spaces, or accounting for no date-stamped directories, but as a temporary workaround you could use the structure they intended,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail

2005-09-04 Thread Darin Cox
Hi Dave, One comment. I don't think of Declude as an set it and forget it-type tool. It does take maintenance to stay on top of the spam problem... adding tests when needed, removing old tests, adjusting weights, etc... in general adjusting as the spam war changes. When we first installed it,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail

2005-09-04 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
1) Declude leaves directories with names such as 6432144091.vir in the SPOOL/PROC overflow directory and it NEVER goes back and removes these directories or cleans them up. I have to manually delete the .vir directories. I havenĀ“t seen that in my system smartermail/declude installation

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail

2005-09-04 Thread Dave Beckstrom
Luis, Thank you so much for your post! When you said that you are running with HOLD %DATE% with no problems it got me to wondering. If it worked for you, why not for me? I thought about itthen a light went on... I opened up the $default$junkmail file and in my editor I turned on the