Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Kill list information! -from Image`fx

2002-08-13 Thread Don Brown
Do I detect the presence of a lawyer, in between the lines? Tuesday, August 13, 2002, 8:34:56 PM, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: T> I will not be posting anymore updates for the T> Declude kill list, however, I will keep my list T> up to date. You can download my Declude Kill T> File from the

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude Kill list information! -from Image`fx

2002-08-13 Thread Tom
I will not be posting anymore updates for the Declude kill list, however, I will keep my list up to date. You can download my Declude Kill File from the following URL: http://www.imagefxonline.net/apps/delog/fromfile.txt You can also use the following tool: http://www.nerosoft.com/Files/KillLi

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST for Client

2002-08-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
>>>Is it possible to have a whitelist on an indivdual basis? like in the >>>clientname.junkmail >> >>No, that is not currently possible. > >Will it ever be possible? It is something that we are planning to add in the near future, but have not yet started the work on it.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST for Client

2002-08-13 Thread Koree A. Smith
R. Scott Perry wrote: > >> Is it possible to have a whitelist on an indivdual basis? like in the >> clientname.junkmail > > > No, that is not currently possible. Will it ever be possible? Koree --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-m

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] nWhiteLists >200 ?

2002-08-13 Thread Andy Schmidt
Unfortunately, I do not. I only happened upon this message while scanning through the log file for another issue. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Syntax for the routeto

2002-08-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Any idea when the latest beta becomes official? :) I'm guessing within a week or two. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] nWhiteLists >200 ?

2002-08-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
> >> Which version of Declude are you running << > >According to the mail header: > >X-Declude: Version 1.57 This sounds like a new issue. Do you happen to have the headers of this E-mail (which would make tracking down the problem a bit easier)? -Scott --- [This

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] nWhiteLists >200 ?

2002-08-13 Thread Andy Schmidt
>> Which version of Declude are you running << According to the mail header: X-Declude: Version 1.57 --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL P

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Syntax for the routeto

2002-08-13 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Any idea when the latest beta becomes official? :) Sharyn We are the worldwide producer and marketer of the award winning Cruzan Single Barrel Rum, judged "Best in the World" at the annual San Francisco Wine and Spirits Championships, and the artisan tequilas of Porfidio 100% Agave Tequilas

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] nWhiteLists >200 ?

2002-08-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
>This entry appeared exactly ONE time in my mail logs of today. Since I only >have 30 white-lists and it never reported the problem before or after, it >appears as if this is a bug in declude? > >08/13/2002 08:43:41 Qfef5314f025cc6e0 ERROR: nWhiteLists >200 (1852403049) Which version of Declude

[Declude.JunkMail] nWhiteLists >200 ?

2002-08-13 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi Scott: This entry appeared exactly ONE time in my mail logs of today. Since I only have 30 white-lists and it never reported the problem before or after, it appears as if this is a bug in declude? 08/13/2002 08:43:41 Qfef5314f025cc6e0 SPAMROUTING:4 REVDNS:5 HEUR8:2 . Total weight = 11 08/13/

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Syntax for the routeto

2002-08-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
>What is the correct syntax for the routeto command? From my previous post about this: > That is correct -- beta features are normally never mentioned in the manual, only on this list. :) For information on beta features, you'll need to check the archives (see the URL below).

[Declude.JunkMail] Syntax for the routeto

2002-08-13 Thread Steven
What is the correct syntax for the routeto command? --- Steven Cmajdalka [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Graphics Group 2800 Taylor St Dallas, TX 75226 --- --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList... syntax.

2002-08-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Is this correct? > >WHITELIST FROM .Microsoft.com > >This will whitelist any email coming from Microsoft such as: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >or should it be written differently? We are seeing certain whitelist >listings being trapped and we are just a bit confused. That will wo

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST for Client

2002-08-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Is it possible to have a whitelist on an indivdual basis? like in the >clientname.junkmail No, that is not currently possible. >How many whitelist can we have in the global.cfg? Up to 200. Remember, though, that every whitelist entry you add will typically slightly increase the amount of sp

[Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList... syntax.

2002-08-13 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message Hi; Is this correct?   WHITELIST FROM .Microsoft.com   This will whitelist any email coming from Microsoft such as:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]   or should it be written differently? We are seeing certain whitelist listings being trapped and we are just a bit confused

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BLARSBL:Spam pretending to be from spamcop - anyone else get these.

2002-08-13 Thread Mike Griffin - Handy Networks, LLC
Hi Chuck- I haven't seen any come through recently, however here is a couple we bounced back on the 6th (from different IP's than yours). (we bounce at 20 weight) /06/2002 12:22:58 Q13fe07470286104e OSSOFT:5 SPAMCOP:17 SBL:15 REVDNS:1 . Total weight = 38 08/06/2002 12:22:58 Q13fe07470286104e

[Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST for Client

2002-08-13 Thread Danny Klopfer
Is it possible to have a whitelist on an indivdual basis? like in the clientname.junkmail How many whitelist can we have in the global.cfg? Do we need to restart smtp if we add a whitelist? TIA --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mai

[Declude.JunkMail] Just a test.

2002-08-13 Thread Dustin Freeman
Just a test. Dustin Freeman Rath Information Systems 2822 US Hwy 68 South Bellefontaine OH 43311 Ph: 937-599-5096 Fax: 937-592-4165 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail maili

[Declude.JunkMail] Common Configurations

2002-08-13 Thread Koree A. Smith
Ladies and Gentlemen: Just curious what the best configuration for Declude Junkmail has been for you? I find that a lot of the tests catch a lot of legit mail, but if I release those tests, that Spam increases tenfold. Osirusoft and ORDB seem to be good test. Anyone care to share with me wh

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BLARSBL:Spam pretending to be fromspamcop - anyone else get these.

2002-08-13 Thread Scott MacLean
When I reported this to SpamCop, I got the following response: Reply-To: "Ellen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Ellen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "System Administrator" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Your site will be shut down Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:05:30 -0400 Hi -- The email you received did no

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Redirecting spam to different folders

2002-08-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Where do I find the syntax for the correct setup of the routeto action? >I am looking at http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm right now, >but I don't see anything about that action, I guess because it's still >beta? That is correct -- beta features are normally never mentioned in the man

[Declude.JunkMail] BLARSBL:Spam pretending to be from spamcop - anyone else get these.

2002-08-13 Thread Chuck Schick
My abuse mail boxes all had spam this morning pretending to be from spam cop. These has titles like - "Your site will be shut down" "We will block you from millions of users" "Your network is being compromised" It gave out the phone number for Julian Haight of spam cop. Looks like some spamme

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Redirecting spam to different folders

2002-08-13 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
One possibility might be to use the ROUTETO action in the latest beta for the WEIGHT20 test (all the spam would end up getting sent to a mailbox file), while the WEIGHT16 test could use the HOLD action. That way, all the held E-mail would be the E-mail failing the WEIGHT16 test.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Redirecting spam to different folders

2002-08-13 Thread Steven
How do you use the routeto command? --- Steven Cmajdalka [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Graphics Group 2800 Taylor St Dallas, TX 75226 --- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Redirecting spam to different folders

2002-08-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
>What I am trying to do now, is create a weight16 test, set it to have a >HOLD action, but have the emails failing the weight16 go to a different >spam folder than the ones failing a weight20 test. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to have the spam sent to a different hold directory (although th

[Declude.JunkMail] Redirecting spam to different folders

2002-08-13 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Morning Folks, I am wondering if there is a way to do the following: I currently have the weight20 test action set to HOLD and have been monitoring my spam folder for the last few weeks. I am convinced that the email that this test has been catching and holding is all spam, with no legit email m