Hi Scott,
Feature request: instead of dec.log, can the log file name be more
configurable like decMMDDHH.log. When I do a debug, the log files get very
big and it is too cumbersome to open. if the 'HH' is included, at least the
log files are broken down to hourly logs.
Thanks,
Tito
---
[Th
Today I had an instance where all my mail started being held as SPAM. 99% of it was
legit mail. At first I thought it may be a sniffer problem as that was installed
within the last week.
Attached is a snippet of logs that shows declude over and over testing a peice of mail
I disabled Sniffer
After editing the message and/or the filter file and cranking up the
loglevel to watch what happens, how can I "replay" Declude JunkMail on this
message?
I've tried excerpting all the previous headers inserted by JunkMail, then
moving the correct D*.smd and Q*.smd files from \imail\spool\spam to
Scenario:
Current filter file has several hits on a given e-mail message, and as a
result with other tests, the HOLD weight is reached.
On examining the held message and the Declude log (LogLevel MID), the total
weight reached for the filter file is too high to match any single entry.
The Declude
Descriptive Subject lines will get you much better answers, but
Scott's already gotten back to you.
> Is there a way that if the sender is a recognized user of our mail
> system to ignore all spam filters?
You mean "if the sender impersonates a recognized user" (like so many
spammers do
Title: Message
Wrong Person.
I asked :
Hi there,
We seem to be having a problem with the current
configuration of the Declude Junk Mail filter.
If one of our employees sends an email from his
whereever he has a routable ip address that is on one of the Blacklists by no
fault of his o
> It would be nice for some of our customers to allow users to add an
> entry to their address book that would allow all spam to come
> through...
We use *@example.com (everyone at one domain) and * (everyone at all
domains) in our custom app, which uses aliases.txt as a whitelist.
(
Is there a limit on the filename size for Declude JM?
I have a feeling that a long filename is not being read. I will do more
debugging but here is the filename for one filter file.
IMail_Filter_URLinBody.txt
Are those actually underscores, or could they be spaces (which might be an
issue)?
Title: Message
Sorry.. the last
post about the filename was not the issue causing the
problem.
It seems like if
the weight is put as a real number (20.00) the system somehow passes over it and
does not detect the rest.
The database
output was creating:
MAILFROM 20.00
CONTAINS
Title: Message
Scott:
Is there a limit
on the filename size for Declude JM?
I have a feeling
that a long filename is not being read. I will do more debugging but here
is the filename for one filter file.
IMail_Filter_URLinBody.txt
Just
curious..
Regards,
Kami
Have you ever seen this error message. It now pops out occasionally in my
server. I'm running the latest F-Prot software.
C:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\F-Prot.exe
x#=0D, CS=01CD IP=5703. The NTVDM CPU has encountered an unhandled
exception.
Choose 'Close' to terminate the application.
A few peo
Hi Scott,
Have you ever seen this error message. It now pops out occasionally in my
server. I'm running the latest F-Prot software.
C:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\F-Prot.exe
x#=0D, CS=01CD IP=5703. The NTVDM CPU has encountered an unhandled
exception.
Choose 'Close' to terminate the application.
T
The AUTOWHITELIST option that we are adding to Declude JunkMail will
automatically check incoming E-mail against a user's address book, and
whitelist E-mail if the return address is listed in the address book.
It would be nice for some of our customers to allow users to add an entry
to their ad
I have discovered in several cases that the IP address they are using is
in a spam database.
My Question is this: Is there a way to ignore the Spam Weighting if they
have an account on the system?
No.
However, in this case, you may want to re-consider the settings for
outgoing E-mail (in t
Hi all, I am new to list and am hoping that you can
help me with a problem I am having:
We have several hundred employees all over the
USA. Some of these people use various means of connecting to the internet,
some ISDN, Cable, DSL, dialup. Everyonce in a while, I get a call from on
of
The (5) refers to the line number of the test in the filter file that failed.
Stu
At 12:05 PM 01/22/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>I wanted to see if anyone new what the number meant behind the Filter
>test failures when listed in the log file. For example: message failed
>Filter_test (5) We are try
I wanted to see if anyone new what the number meant behind the Filter test
failures when listed in the log file. For example: message failed
Filter_test (5) We are trying to figure out which line in our filter
test actually failed. We have logging set to LOW I know if our test
fails a fr
Title: Filter tests info in log
I wanted to see if anyone new what the number meant behind the Filter test failures when listed in the log file. For example: message failed Filter_test (5) We are trying to figure out which line in our filter test actually failed. We have logging set to LO
Title: Message
This
is great for sharing and thank you. Is anyone interested in
sharing their global.cfg and white/black list files and strategies
that are working well for them. I feel overwhelmed these days keeping up the
spam battle as mail server admin and all the other daily chores I am
19 matches
Mail list logo
