RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Our filter fromfiles.

2003-01-22 Thread Don Schreiner
Title: Message



This 
is great for sharing and thank you.Is anyoneinterested in 
sharingtheir global.cfgand white/black list files and strategies 
that are working well for them. I feel overwhelmed these days keeping up the 
spam battle as mail server admin and all the other daily chores I am 
responsible. We handle a lot of religious and family oriented sites and cannot 
slack on our Spam control.

A few 
days ago, I finally bit the bullet and subscribed to sortmonster's sniffer. 
Hoping the$300/yr will decrease my Spam review time spent each day. I 
thought I was doing a pretty good job of eliminating spam - until I put a hold 
for reviewon all caught bythe sniffer filter.Basically 
Idiscovered thatwe are onlystopping about1/2 of the Spam 
hitting our server.Some confirmed Spam I reviewed failed no other tests 
other than sniffer. Now I am trying to figure outhow to revise my 
weighting so I do not have so much to review in the hold folder.We have 
weight of 20 for hold and 30 for delete. We run about 18 filters all weighted. I 
want more deletes and less to review in the hold folder daily! Sniffer is 
picking up a lot of false positives too and I know I need to get reporting with 
them and taking advantage of their custom config files for my license. I use 
Tom's updated list ongoing for our blacklist from file and it is a big 
help.

Is 
anyone willing to share their global.cfg who areusing sniffer, weighting, 
and their effective black and white lists that is workingout well for 
them? You can e-mail me off list [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Thanks.

Don SchreinerCompBiz, 
Inc.www.compbiz.net407-322-8654800-408-3688


-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
On Behalf Of Kami RazvanSent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 6:47 
PMTo: JunkMail ListSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Our filter 
 fromfiles.
Hi;

In case you are 
interested, we have created a simple Access database that contains all of our 
entries in for our fromfile and filter files.

Since it is all in 
the database we thought we can simply replicate it with the web site and provide 
it to all to use or consider.

You may want to 
visit:

http://www.ClickandPledge.com/Support/Mail

The 
categories are all separated since we have a different file for each filter 
type.

Just 
for the records: We hold on weight 20 so all weights are based on this 
weight.

FreeeMail list - should not be used as a blacklist but 
a weight list. We add 5 to this list. This list does not contain 
Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. It has other (Yahoo.com.tw) 
domains.

Hope it 
helps...

Regards,
Kami


[Declude.JunkMail] Filter tests info in log

2003-01-22 Thread Keith Johnson
Title: Filter tests info in log






I wanted to see if anyone new what the number meant behind the Filter test failures when listed in the log file. For example: message failed Filter_test (5) We are trying to figure out which line in our filter test actually failed. We have logging set to LOW I know if our test fails a fromfile test it lists in the header. Thanks for any aid.

___


Keith Johnson, MCP

Network Engineer

Network Advocates, Inc.

Tel: 502.412.1050

Fax: 502.412.1058

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Good pings come in small packets






Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter tests info in log

2003-01-22 Thread R. Scott Perry


I wanted to see if anyone new what the number meant behind the Filter test 
failures when listed in the log file.  For example: message failed 
Filter_test (5)   We are trying to figure out which line in our filter 
test actually failed.  We have logging set to LOW  I know if our test 
fails a fromfile test it lists in the header.  Thanks for any aid.

The number in the parentheses is the line number that caused the E-mail to 
fail the filter.
-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter tests info in log

2003-01-22 Thread smb
The (5) refers to the line number of the test in the filter file that failed.

Stu


At 12:05 PM 01/22/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I wanted to see if anyone new what the number meant behind the Filter
test failures when listed in the log file.  For example: message failed
Filter_test (5)   We are trying to figure out which line in our filter
test actually failed.  We have logging set to LOW  I know if our test
fails a fromfile test it lists in the header.  Thanks for any aid.

___

Keith Johnson, MCP
Network Engineer
Network Advocates, Inc.
Tel:   502.412.1050
Fax:  502.412.1058
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Good pings come in small packets


!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN
HTML
HEAD
META HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html; charset=us-ascii
META NAME=Generator CONTENT=MS Exchange Server version 6.0.5770.91
TITLEFilter tests info in log/TITLE
/HEAD
BODY
!-- Converted from text/rtf format --

PFONT SIZE=2 FACE=ArialI wanted to see if anyone new what the number
meant behind the Filter test failures when listed in the log file.nbsp; For
example: message failed Filter_test (5)nbsp;nbsp; We are trying to figure
out which line in our filter test actually failed.nbsp; We have logging set
to LOWnbsp; I know if our test fails a fromfile test it lists in the
header.nbsp; Thanks for any aid./FONT/P

PFONT COLOR=#80 SIZE=2 FACE=Arial___/FONT
/P

PBIFONT COLOR=#80 SIZE=2 FACE=ArialKeith Johnson,
MCP/FONT/I/BI/I

BRFONT SIZE=2 FACE=ArialNetwork Engineer/FONT

BRFONT SIZE=2 FACE=ArialNetwork Advocates, Inc./FONT

BRFONT SIZE=2 FACE=ArialTel:nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;
502.412.1050/FONT

BRFONT SIZE=2 FACE=ArialFax:nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;
502.412.1058/FONT

BRFONT SIZE=2 FACE=ArialEmail:nbsp; [EMAIL PROTECTED]/FONT
/P

PFONT SIZE=2 FACE=Arialquot;Good pings come in small
packetsquot;/FONT
/P
BR

/BODY
/HTML
-
CSOnline Technical Support hours - Monday thru Saturday 7am - 1am 
CSOnline Technical Support Numbers Seneca814-677-2447 
   Clarion   814-227-3638  
   Meadville 814-425-1696
   Parker724-399-1158   
http://www.csonline.net  http://www.cshowcase.com  http://www.learncenter.com  
-

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] Hello

2003-01-22 Thread Jay Calvert



Hi all, I am new to list and am hoping that you can 
help me with a problem I am having:


We have several hundred employees all over the 
USA. Some of these people use various means of connecting to the internet, 
some ISDN, Cable, DSL, dialup. Everyonce in a while, I get a call from on 
of these employees stating that when they send email through our server, our 
mail server is not forwarding on the message to the recipient. 


I have discovered in several cases that the IP 
address they are using is in a spam database.

My Question is this: Is there a way to ignore 
the Spam Weighting if they have an account on the system?

Thanks.

Jay


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hello

2003-01-22 Thread R. Scott Perry


I have discovered in several cases that the IP address they are using is 
in a spam database.

My Question is this:  Is there a way to ignore the Spam Weighting if they 
have an account on the system?

No.

However, in this case, you may want to re-consider the settings for 
outgoing E-mail (in the global.cfg file).  For example, if you are blocking 
outgoing E-mail based on the total weight (such as the WEIGHT10 test), you 
may want to change it to a higher value (blocking based on the WEIGHT20 
test, for example).
  -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Ideas on a way to use the AUTOWHITELIST option to allow spamto come through?

2003-01-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
The AUTOWHITELIST option that we are adding to Declude JunkMail will 
automatically check incoming E-mail against a user's address book, and 
whitelist E-mail if the return address is listed in the address book.

It would be nice for some of our customers to allow users to add an entry 
to their address book that would allow all spam to come through, for those 
people that don't want any spam protection.  Someone suggested using 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to whitelist all incoming E-mail, but all.com is a valid 
domain name, and we would prefer not to use it for this purpose.  Would 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] work well for this (so that a user could add 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to their address book to allow spam through), or would a 
different address be better ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), or perhaps a name 
instead (Send Spam [EMAIL PROTECTED])?
   -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] NOPOSTMASTER:Re:F-Prot Error

2003-01-22 Thread Tito Macapinlac
Hi Scott,

Have you ever seen this error message.  It now pops out occasionally in my
server.  I'm running the latest F-Prot software.

C:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\F-Prot.exe
x#=0D, CS=01CD IP=5703. The NTVDM CPU has encountered an unhandled
exception.
Choose 'Close' to terminate the application.

Thanks,
Tito

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:F-Prot Error

2003-01-22 Thread R. Scott Perry


Have you ever seen this error message.  It now pops out occasionally in my
server.  I'm running the latest F-Prot software.

C:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\F-Prot.exe
x#=0D, CS=01CD IP=5703. The NTVDM CPU has encountered an unhandled
exception.
Choose 'Close' to terminate the application.


A few people have reported seeing that -- I would recommend using the 
fpcmd.exe file instead (which is part of the Windows version of F-Prot), as 
it is a 32-bit program that avoids NTVDM.
-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Limit on filter file name?

2003-01-22 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message



Scott:

Is there a limit 
on the filename size for Declude JM?

I have a feeling 
that a long filename is not being read. I will do more debugging but here 
is the filename for one filter file.

IMail_Filter_URLinBody.txt

Just 
curious..

Regards,
Kami


[Declude.JunkMail] Weight is Integer ..

2003-01-22 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message



Sorry.. the last 
post about the filename was not the issue causing the 
problem.

It seems like if 
the weight is put as a real number (20.00) the system somehow passes over it and 
does not detect the rest.

The database 
output was creating:

MAILFROM 20.00 
CONTAINS inkjet

 apparently 
that causes big big problems.

Oh well... it is 
fixed.

Regards,
Kami


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Limit on filter file name?

2003-01-22 Thread R. Scott Perry


Is there a limit on the filename size for Declude JM?

I have a feeling that a long filename is not being read.  I will do more 
debugging but here is the filename for one filter file.

IMail_Filter_URLinBody.txt

Are those actually underscores, or could they be spaces (which might be an 
issue)?  There shouldn't be a noticeable limit as to the file size.
   -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Ideas on a way to use the AUTOWHITELIST option to allow spam to come through?

2003-01-22 Thread Sanford Whiteman
 It  would be nice for some of our customers to allow users to add an
 entry  to  their  address  book  that  would  allow all spam to come
 through...

We  use  *@example.com (everyone at one domain) and * (everyone at all
domains)  in  our  custom  app, which uses aliases.txt as a whitelist.
(Yes,  IMail  will  allow  these  values  to  be  saved  from  the web
interface.)

-Sandy

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Limit on filter file name?

2003-01-22 Thread Jay Calvert
Title: Message



Wrong Person.

I asked :


Hi there,

We seem to be having a problem with the current 
configuration of the Declude Junk Mail filter.

If one of our employees sends an email from his 
whereever he has a routable ip address that is on one of the Blacklists by no 
fault of his own. Declude marks it as spam and doesn't send it. Is 
there a way that if the sender is a recognized user of our mail system to ignore 
all spam filters?


Thanks,

Jay Calvert
Canspec Group,Inc.
- Original Message - 

  From: 
  Kami Razvan 
  
  To: JunkMail List 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:27 
  PM
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Limit on 
  filter file name?
  
  Scott:
  
  Is there a limit 
  on the filename size for Declude JM?
  
  I have a feeling 
  that a long filename is not being read. I will do more debugging but 
  here is the filename for one filter file.
  
  IMail_Filter_URLinBody.txt
  
  Just 
  curious..
  
  Regards,
  Kami


Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Hello

2003-01-22 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Descriptive  Subject  lines  will  get  you  much  better answers, but
Scott's already gotten back to you.

 Is  there  a way that if the sender is a recognized user of our mail
 system to ignore all spam filters?

You  mean if the sender impersonates a recognized user (like so many
spammers do)?

As  Scott said, adjust your weights, or (a) if you know the particular
IP  address,  and  it's  just  one host on a Class C or something like
that,  whitelist  it;  (b)  if  he's  getting  roaming  access  from a
blacklisted ISP, tell him to get a new ISP.

-Sandy

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] Debugging a filter file with the Pro version

2003-01-22 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Scenario:

Current filter file has several hits on a given e-mail message, and as a
result with other tests, the HOLD weight is reached.

On examining the held message and the Declude log (LogLevel MID), the total
weight reached for the filter file is too high to match any single entry.
The Declude log entry only shows the line number of the last test that
matched (a hit).

After editing the message and/or the filter file and cranking up the
loglevel to watch what happens, how can I replay Declude JunkMail on this
message?

I've tried excerpting all the previous headers inserted by JunkMail, then
moving the correct D*.smd and Q*.smd files from \imail\spool\spam to
\imail\spool and then telling the IMail administrator program to Send One.
JunkMail fires off, and the message gets delivered right away, but the
message is not analyzed again, it is simply delivered.

Much obliged,

Andrew 8)
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Debugging a filter file with the Proversion

2003-01-22 Thread R. Scott Perry


After editing the message and/or the filter file and cranking up the
loglevel to watch what happens, how can I replay Declude JunkMail on this
message?

I've tried excerpting all the previous headers inserted by JunkMail, then
moving the correct D*.smd and Q*.smd files from \imail\spool\spam to
\imail\spool and then telling the IMail administrator program to Send One.
JunkMail fires off, and the message gets delivered right away, but the
message is not analyzed again, it is simply delivered.


The problem here is that Declude will only scan E-mail as it arrives, to 
prevent the possibility of scanning the same message multiple times (which 
also allows delivery of held messages, for example).

In order to have Declude scan it again, you would need to send the E-mail 
via SMTP again.  In this case, it might be easiest to cut and paste the 
body of the E-mail into a mail client, which could then send the 
E-mail.  It wouldn't have the original headers, but if you are mostly 
filtering on the body of the E-mail, it should work.
-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Declude Gone Wild

2003-01-22 Thread Darrell LaRock
Today I had an instance where all my mail started being held as SPAM.  99% of it was 
legit mail.  At first I thought it may be a sniffer problem as that was installed 
within the last week.

Attached is a snippet of logs that shows declude over and over testing a peice of mail

I disabled Sniffer at approximatly 2:30pm today.  Reviewing the logs now seems to show 
that declude is still repeating the behavior below *substantially* less though.

I am running Declude 1.63

Any thoughts?

//INITIAL PROBLEM
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed OSRELAY (This entry was last 
confirmed open on 1/4/2003). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed SPAMCOP (Blocked - see 
http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?202.105.130.36). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed DSBL 
(http://dsbl.org/listing.php?202.105.130.36). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed NJABL (relay tested -- 1007947419). 
Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed BADHEADERS (This E-mail was sent from 
a broken mail client [804f].). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed REVDNS (This E-mail was sent from a 
MUA/MTA 202.105.130.36 with no reverse DNS entry.). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed SNIFFER (Message failed SNIFFER: 
63.). Action=HOLD.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed WEIGHT10 (Weight of 32 reaches or 
exceeds the limit of 10.). Action=BOUNCE.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed OSRELAY (This entry was last 
confirmed open on 1/4/2003). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed SPAMCOP (Blocked - see 
http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?202.105.130.36). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed DSBL 
(http://dsbl.org/listing.php?202.105.130.36). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed NJABL (relay tested -- 1007947419). 
Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed BADHEADERS (This E-mail was sent from 
a broken mail client [804f].). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed REVDNS (This E-mail was sent from a 
MUA/MTA 202.105.130.36 with no reverse DNS entry.). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed SNIFFER (Message failed SNIFFER: 
63.). Action=HOLD.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed WEIGHT10 (Weight of 32 reaches or 
exceeds the limit of 10.). Action=BOUNCE.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed OSRELAY (This entry was last 
confirmed open on 1/4/2003). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed SPAMCOP (Blocked - see 
http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?202.105.130.36). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed DSBL 
(http://dsbl.org/listing.php?202.105.130.36). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed NJABL (relay tested -- 1007947419). 
Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed BADHEADERS (This E-mail was sent from 
a broken mail client [804f].). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed REVDNS (This E-mail was sent from a 
MUA/MTA 202.105.130.36 with no reverse DNS entry.). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed SNIFFER (Message failed SNIFFER: 
63.). Action=HOLD.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed WEIGHT10 (Weight of 32 reaches or 
exceeds the limit of 10.). Action=BOUNCE.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed OSRELAY (This entry was last 
confirmed open on 1/4/2003). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed SPAMCOP (Blocked - see 
http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?202.105.130.36). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed DSBL 
(http://dsbl.org/listing.php?202.105.130.36). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed NJABL (relay tested -- 1007947419). 
Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed BADHEADERS (This E-mail was sent from 
a broken mail client [804f].). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed REVDNS (This E-mail was sent from a 
MUA/MTA 202.105.130.36 with no reverse DNS entry.). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed SNIFFER (Message failed SNIFFER: 
63.). Action=HOLD.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed WEIGHT10 (Weight of 32 reaches or 
exceeds the limit of 10.). Action=BOUNCE.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed OSRELAY (This entry was last 
confirmed open on 1/4/2003). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed SPAMCOP (Blocked - see 
http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?202.105.130.36). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed DSBL 
(http://dsbl.org/listing.php?202.105.130.36). Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed NJABL (relay tested -- 1007947419). 
Action=WARN.
01/22/2003 09:56:35 Qafa31fcd00869f47 Msg failed BADHEADERS (This E-mail was sent from 
a broken mail 

[Declude.JunkMail] NOPOSTMASTER:Log Files

2003-01-22 Thread Tito Macapinlac
Hi Scott,

Feature request: instead of dec.log, can the log file name be more
configurable like decMMDDHH.log.  When I do a debug, the log files get very
big and it is too cumbersome to open.  if the 'HH' is included, at least the
log files are broken down to hourly logs.

Thanks,
Tito

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.