Ok so what are the best tests that catch the most junkmail and not good
mail.
oh if only we knew.. there would be no spam. =)
Do I really need to subscribe to a service?
We're not and we catch over 70%.
lastly if i wanted to create a blacklist.txt file I have read the
testfrom
How about it being an optional/additional test type? So that instead of
making older users update, they can choose to switch to that format? Did
that sound right? LOL!
That does sound right, and was something that I was thinking about. :)
We will investigate this possibility, after seeing what
I am sure I never subscribed to it, and I have seen them sent to 3 other
employees here.
You said: This can be done with a
Sender blacklist or IP blacklist.
Will this work with the version I have? Junkmail Light?
I am currently catching them with my rules in Imail, but would like Junkmail
to do
Bruce:
With a lot of the big Spam Farms - they end up using a lot of different
IPs and they constantly change them. This also keeps them under a lot of
the spamcop complains. We have found that creating a fromfile with their
from names helps reduce this problem.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
Hi,
I am a brand new user of Junk Mail and have a question.
I have received a lot of spam from this sender in the past day:
[..]
Are you positive that it isn't related to an opt-in list from
promotiondaily.com that you may have subscribed to? Those IPs are listed
in INTERSIL and XBL,
You said: This can be done with a
Sender blacklist or IP blacklist.
Will this work with the version I have? Junkmail Light?
Sorry about that, I should have mentioned that those will only work with
the Standard and Pro versions.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for
Scott,
We will investigate this possibility, after seeing what else might be
possible currently. In this case, it looks like using LOGLEVEL HIGH
might be all that is needed, as that will add the phrase from the filter
file to the log file.
The problem with log level high is that log files
Now adding the phrase to the mid level in conjunction or in place of the
line number might work even if the phrase was limited to the first 10-15
characters. The line number would give the approx location and the first
part of the phrase could narrow it down further. I think that would work.
I
At 05:13 PM 04/01/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Now adding the phrase to the mid level in conjunction or in place of the
line number might work even if the phrase was limited to the first 10-15
characters. The line number would give the approx location and the first
part of the phrase could narrow it
My only thought is, by some weird chance a spammer is using a real
return adress (I know that is truly funny), they would be able
troubleshoot the fails by sending to an invalid email address or a known
full mailbox and simply read the headers in the standard bounce message.
But I think this is a
However, I'd like to hear if anyone may have a problem with having the
phrase appear in an X-RBL-Warning: header.
Stu and Charles brought up 2 good examples.
John Tolmachoff
MCSE, CSSA
Owner, Network Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
City of Industry, CA
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
11 matches
Mail list logo
