RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RFC-IGNORANT Test

2003-06-11 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi; Dan Omar.. I think it would be interesting to, at least explore, the possibility of giving negative weight to emails that pass the test. It would be also interesting to be able to assign positive weight to emails that fail. Rfc-ignorant appears to be a site that works based on reports. It

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] My domain failing HELOBOGUS

2003-06-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
Why would my IMGATE machine fail the HELOBOGUS test when HELO/EHLO data header returns: 220 hasna.jeeran.com - ESMTP - Postfix - Ahlan Wa Sahlan Which seems complaint to me. Here is the error in the log file: Msg failed MX; testing A (HELOBOGUS ) [0 1 0 ] The problem is that the IMGATE

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] best Practices and Per Domain Whitelisting

2003-06-11 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi Dan: In case Bill is not around. That is correct.. What you have will work. That is what we do... Regards, Kami -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] best Practices and Per Domain Whitelisting Whitelisting

2003-06-11 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Hi, John, Do you have a link to your program? No link, as it never made it out of beta, do to the company it was created under... Here is the explination: Declude calls Match passing the sender and recipients. Match checks the sender against the from.txt file for a match. (Specific address

[Declude.JunkMail] Confusing Log Messages

2003-06-11 Thread Doug McKee
06/11/2003 15:59:31 Q982f0f6 Your virus scanner DOES NOT EXIST (at d:\IMail\spool\D982f0f6.vir\); NOT SCANNING ATTACHMENTS! [2] 06/11/2003 15:59:31 Q982f0f6 Scanned: Error starting scanner 06/11/2003 15:59:32 Q98150c4 Could not find report file d:\IMail\spool\D98150c4.vir\report.txt. 06/11/2003

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Using SPAMDOMAINS Test

2003-06-11 Thread Bill Landry
Dan, let me take a stab at an explanation. The SPAMDOMAINS test was implemented to help catch spammers that use frequently forged/abused domains in their spam messages, domains like yahoo.com, hotmail.com, aol.com, juno.com, etc. These large mail providers typically have DNS records that are

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Using SPAMDOMAINS Test

2003-06-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
I've been trying to read all the messages related to this test and I'm having a hard time understanding what exactly the test is, i.e. what purpose it serves, and how I go about putting it in place. The SPAMDOMAINS test lets you define a list of domains that under more scrutiny than others.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamManager question

2003-06-11 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Title: Spammanager question Short answer, I love it. I have been using it since it was first out in beta. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammanager question

2003-06-11 Thread Bill Landry
Title: Spammanager question Keith, CYBERSitter is getting very close to announcing theofficial release of their AlliGate for Declude (formerly SpamManager) plug-in. My understanding is that the finishing touches are being applied to the documentation and then it will be released. I've been

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammanager question

2003-06-11 Thread Jeffrey Di Gregorio
Title: Spammanager question Spammanager is a great product, and excellent support from Brian. This test alone accounts for about 70% of my hold weight. Jeffrey Di Gregorio Systems Administrator Pacific School of Religion -Original Message- From: Keith Johnson

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Using SPAMDOMAINS Test

2003-06-11 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
I have the same trouble following the discussion of new tests. Some of them sound very useful, but since I have many other things to do besides play with the mail server and Declude, I generally can't take the time to pull all the list messages together into a semblance of order to figure out

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamManager question

2003-06-11 Thread brian
It's going to be a whole lot better here in a day or two. I've incorporated all the new stuff we put into the Alligate Gateway into the version for Declude. There is HTML density testing, compression testing, repeat spammer tracking, foolproof obfuscation detection and removal, and a lot more.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamManager question

2003-06-11 Thread Frederick Samarelli
Brian let me know when you are ready, I would like to try it. Thanks. Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 7:25 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamManager question It's going to be a whole lot

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamManager question

2003-06-11 Thread brian
Hi Fred, Sure, I'll be posting a message here, probably tomorrow. Brian On 06/11/03 8:07pm you wrote... Brian let me know when you are ready, I would like to try it. Thanks. Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamManager question

2003-06-11 Thread Keith Johnson
Brian, That sounds awesome. Should I wait for the new release or go ahead an implement your current version. Will there be a pricing increase, versus an upgrade charge if I buy it now. Thanks for the info. Keith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] help configuring junkmail

2003-06-11 Thread Serge
Many spams will only trigger OSSRC, or SPAMCOP, for these spams, the wheight system does not work, how do you guys handle these ? after more then 3 month of use on my personal mailbox, these 2 tests did not produce any false positives. Should i generalize their use ? Also, noticed that weight20

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Confusing Log Messages

2003-06-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
[Follow-ups to Declude Virus mailing list, please] 06/11/2003 15:59:31 Q982f0f6 Your virus scanner DOES NOT EXIST (at d:\IMail\spool\D982f0f6.vir\); NOT SCANNING ATTACHMENTS! [2] That error means that there is a very unusual problem with the virus scanner path (as in Declude Virus doesn't even