Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

2003-10-04 Thread Don Brown
Don't hold your breath, though. ICANN has a way of spinning things, so it looks like they are doing the right thing. A good recent example is WLS. They initially came out against WLS, but later and in spite of overwhelming opposition from the Internet Community and contrary to the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] File contention issues?

2003-10-04 Thread Omar K.
I have imail 6 on W2K AS and have had the same problems, only happens when the server is hammered with mail and there is a 100% CPU util. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 6:54 PM To:

[Declude.JunkMail] Problem with PacBell

2003-10-04 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Below is the entire header as received by Imail from that IP address on PacBell. The local user authenticated to Imail. The user was then able to send over 200 messages. Declude Hijack caught them. It appears that PacBell is doing some kind of funny business when users send e-mail. I am not

[Declude.JunkMail] spamarrest.com

2003-10-04 Thread Danny Klopfer
Anyone know if there is a way to setup declude/imail to do what spamarrest.com is doing? This sounds like it may be a nice solution for some customers.

[Declude.JunkMail] Hurah!

2003-10-04 Thread Joshua Levitsky
Anyone notice what is so wonderful about the query below? ; DiG 9.2.2 skjsakjsajkas.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 29043 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

2003-10-04 Thread Webmaster Oilfield Directory
Finally someone is cutting thru the Bull and not afraid to tell it as it really is. money talks BS walks. that is the REALITY in the business world today. and don't tell me you wouldn't do the same the bottomline is that matters to people if they can be poliitcally