It's doing what it should, it's testing the sender and not the receiver.
Score both tests lower if you want to use that functionality for this
purpose, and so that you don't diminish the value of SPAMDOMAINS
otherwise, you should put it into a different spamdomains type of filter
file specific
> Why wouldn't they be getting the IP of my server once they
> authenticate?
Does this happen with other users? Of course not! Since Declude with
IMail 7.x and lower doesn't know whether a connection was AUTHed,
there's no way that this could work. And with 8.x and higher, th
In an effort to catch spammers forging my domain, I've added my own
domain to a spamdomain test. Now all e-mails sent through outlook are
failing the test because the server is seeing them as coming from
whatever IP the user is connected to. Since they are mostly OPTONLINE
customers they are also f
> looking at the running processes, there was only one SMTP and one
> SMTPD process shouldn't there be more smtp/d process running ?
SMTPD has always been one process per server.
SMTP has a very short "lifespan" in 8.x--it's not really performing
delivery, QUEUEMGR is--so even if you're
In an effort to clean up our junkmail configs, and only use valid tests,
we cleaned out our previous tests (old services that were dead etc) and
replaced them with the ones currently in the declude help files. Since
then, we've been seeing complaints of increased spam/etc. Does anyone
have s
What kind of files are they?
D***.SMD
Q***.SMD
~***.~MD
A***.SMD
T***.SMD
Q.GSE
D.GSE
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROT
Usualy I have less then a 100 file in my spool
but today, there was about 1500
looking at the running processes, there was only one SMTP and one SMTPD
process
shouldn't there be more smtp/d process running ?
I recently upgraded to 8.04 from 8.03
Any hints ?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for virus
> I've uninstalled and reinstalled the updater. It updates the files in
> c:\program files\decludeupdater, but it does not update the
> Declude.exe file under c:\imail. Any ideas?
What is in the declude.ini file in the updater program directory?
Haven't heard about such a problem sinch the up
In an effort to clean up our junkmail configs, and only use valid tests, we
cleaned out our previous tests (old services that were dead etc) and
replaced them with the ones currently in the declude help files. Since
then, we've been seeing complaints of increased spam/etc. Does anyone have
so
Kami,
>From a cursory review of some captured stuff, it seems that it wouldn't
be a good idea to block them. This company for instance sends out
newsletters for Discover and CapitalOne. Some might consider that to
be spam though, and both FIVE-TEN and MAILPOLICE-BULK have picked them
up, how
Hello,
Regarding the Declude Updater put out by Markus G.
I've uninstalled and reinstalled the updater. It updates the files in
c:\program files\decludeupdater,
but it does not update the Declude.exe file under c:\imail. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Burzin
--
Burzin Sumariwalla Phone:
If the entry contains an @ sign (domain only or full email address), the
domain portion of the from address will be matched exactly.
Almost.
For example, "@example.com" will be a partial match (which would catch
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]", for example).
The only time an exact match will be required is
To clarify my understanding:
If the entry contains an @ sign (domain only or full email address), the
domain portion of the from address will be matched exactly.
If the entry does NOT contain an @ sign, it will partial match anything
in the from address (possibly even the mailbox name).
Are thes
Is there any way to define it as "ends with" logic?
That type of filtering is only available in a filter file. The sender
blacklists work on a partial match or exact match only.
Are there any wildcard chars available for this?
No. There are no wildcards anywhere in Declude JunkMail.
Is there any way to define it as "ends with" logic? Are there any
wildcard chars available for this?
Todd Holt
Xidix Technologies, Inc
Las Vegas, NV USA
www.xidix.com
702.319.4349
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kevin he was talking about my description of the process to him. He wasn't trying to
address you
directly. Thanks again, and sorry for wandering off topic.
Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator
VantageMed Operations (Kansas City)
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attac
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Keith Purtell
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Compatibility with .NET
>
>
> Double oops; the programmer just sent me email with a questio
.de is what the problem was. I had a ton of spam coming from .de domains so
I put .de in my blacklist. I don't understand why .de would block
[EMAIL PROTECTED] when this email ends with the domain .com.
".de" in a sender blacklist is the format for "If the E-mail address
contains '.de', block it"
.de is what the problem was. I had a ton of spam coming from .de domains so
I put .de in my blacklist. I don't understand why .de would block
[EMAIL PROTECTED] when this email ends with the domain .com.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R.
I had an email come in today that was deleted because it failed my blacklist
test. However the email address is not listed in my blacklist so why did
declude think it was?
I'm guessing Declude thought it was listed because it was. :)
One common example is that some people blacklist "mail.com" (a
I had an email come in today that was deleted because it failed my blacklist
test. However the email address is not listed in my blacklist so why did
declude think it was?
11/11/2003 10:38:02 Q023124a BlackHole-Senders:30 NOABUSE:2 SPAMCHK:-15 .
Total weight = 17
11/11/2003 10:38:02 Q023124a Msg f
I am trying to find documentation regarding the COUNTRY-CHAIN header which I
have enabled in the GLOBAL.CFG file.
There is no documentation at this time -- it is an experimental
feature. If you search the archives for COUNTRIES, you should find the
details on how to set it up.
So far all I hav
Hello, Kami,
Thanks for the response.
I am trying to find documentation regarding the COUNTRY-CHAIN header which I
have enabled in the GLOBAL.CFG file. I actually enabled it based on what I
saw in your GLOBAL.CFG file.
So far all I have done is just added one header in my GLOBAL.CFG file...
XIN
Hello, Ken,
I appreciate the response but I'm not quite sure if this is what I am
referring to.
In what file do you place the text "COUNTRIES CONTAINS5
kr,cn,br,fr"?
What does COUNTRIES refer to?
I can't find anything in the manual about "COUNTRIES".
Thanks,
Dan
- Original Me
Double oops; the programmer just sent me email with a question about your reply...
"Is that specific to ASP.NET, or any of .NET Languages? I was planning on doing this
using C#. If
you think this will still be a problem, that's fine I will do in VB6. The process you
described to
me would not be
Oops; I was afraid of something like that. Looks like we'll have to try VB instead.
Thank you Kevin.
Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator
VantageMed Operations (Kansas City)
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole
use of the
intended recipient(
Hi;
Just wondering
what the thinking out there is on BigFootInteractive?
We receive tons of
spam that get blocked. The company appears not to be a spammer but it
seems like their system is only used for that purpose.
Any
thoughts?
We are real close
to block their email and their REVD
27 matches
Mail list logo
