You know what I would like to see is a means of sending back a message on
confirmed Spam that carries the "550 User Unknown" designation and a
"from" address appearing to be [EMAIL PROTECTED] (whatever it
was) to make it appear believable.
I realize that a goodly number of these would bounce b
Scott,
You know what I would like to see is a means of sending back a message on
confirmed Spam that carries the "550 User Unknown" designation and a "from"
address appearing to be [EMAIL PROTECTED] (whatever it was) to
make it appear believable.
I realize that a goodly number of these would b
Also, remember if you are using the "bounce" action for anything it has
been renamed to "bounceifyoumust".
This is probably a good time to let people know that on several occasions
the bounce messages that our customers have sent out have been reported as
spam (with the assumption that they wer
Also, remember if you are using the "bounce" action for anything it has been
renamed to "bounceifyoumust".
Darrell
Jonathan writes:
Can't imagine why you'd need to restart .. it hooks the EXE each time it
spawns an smtp thread, so the next message after the EXE is in place,
should use the
Can't imagine why you'd need to restart .. it hooks the EXE each time it
spawns an smtp thread, so the next message after the EXE is in place,
should use the new exe.
Jonathan
At 07:20 PM 1/6/2004, you wrote:
It has been a while since I upgrade my versionare there any special
step to upgra
It has been a while since I upgrade my versionare there any special
step to upgrading or can I simply replace the .exe file and restart Imail
SMTP and POP services?
thanks in advance
gb
At 07:42 PM 1/6/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Woops on the Delude thing
Sorry, it should be:
http://www.d
Woops on the Delude thing
Sorry, it should be:
http://www.declude.com/interim
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
vulnera
Woops on the Delude thing
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 6:53 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] New CMDSPACE test in latest interim release
> We've just added a new test to the latest interim releas
We've just added a new test to the latest interim release, called
CMDSPACE. This one looks for spaces in SMTP commands where there shouldn't
be any.
It is catching about 75% of the spam to the spamtraps here, and since we
started using it, only 1 of the approximately 500 legitimate E-mails tha
> Maybe a problem can occur if a customer sends out a large number of
> e-mails and there are several bounces. But if this happens I assume
> that the addresses was not aquired "regulary" ;-)
I wouldn't say that's an accurate assumption; site-specific factors
will dictate what % of bounce tr
All,
I came across a pre-built filter for Exchange that seems useful for
submailbox redirection (akin to Declude's MAILBOX action) when
forwarding mail to an Exchange back end. As far as I'm aware, Exchange
does not have built-in - type addressing, and if it
does, it's likely nothing l
Thanks Scott, the fix appears to be working.
Regarding that cookie "bug," I understood that Declude tagged the file
appropriately based on the COM extension, but Outlook Express screwed up
attaching it in the way that it did. This was actually a gif used for
tracking, and it named the file acc
Virus Bug
==
The first bug is more straightforward, however it is related to Declude
Virus, so please forgive me for not joining that group. In an E-mail that
was forwarded from monstor.com, it tripped on a banned extension of .com
because a cookie reference was attached by Out
Scott,
Virus Bug
==
The first bug is more straightforward, however it is related to Declude
Virus, so please forgive me for not joining that group. In an E-mail
that was forwarded from monstor.com, it tripped on a banned extension of
.com because a cookie reference was attached
SenderBase is cool, just wish it had more RBL's, or if Scott had CIDR
lookup in DNSStuff. The trick is it is a /20 block, way too many to
check one by one in DNSStuff.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoLink.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
Chuck,
I would use the Spam Database Lookup here, http://www.dnsstuff.com/, and
SenderBase, http://www.senderbase.org/.
Dan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Frolick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 12:26 PM
Subject: [Declud
I have been blocking email that is using the iso-8859 character sets and it
has been effective in reducing Spam. Today I came across MSNBC sending out
a notification using iso-8859. Is anyone aware of others doing this?
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
303-421-5140
www.warp8.com
---
[This E-mail was s
Does anyone know of an easy way to check an entire netblock for
listings? We are suppsed to be getting some additional IP's but I want
to make sure they are clean first.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoLink.net
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
Th
SPEWS and SBL are two opposite extremes. The only time that SBL will
false positive is when they list a hosting company that primarily
engages in providing facilities to spammers. For the most part, these
hosting companies are only fronts that they use to avoid being fully
listed. SBL doesn'
How aggressive is SBL compared to SPEWS? I know with SPEWS they list a lot
of adjacent net blocks of the spammers... Does SBL employ the same tactics?
Darrell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 200
I found that the OBFUSCATION filter can FP on UNICODE attachments (which
are uncommon). The new version of this filter fixes this problem.
Note that I'm only updating the version that uses functionality
introduced and fully supported in JunkMail Pro v1.77i7 or higher. For
users of the older v
Just a quick follow up to this message. Today I removed DSBLMULTI after
two days of testing. Seemingly they consider lots of ISP mail servers
to be spam relays for inclusion in this list. I think I made the
mistake in adding them before...
DSBL is on the other hand very reliable IMO.
Matt
Forgive me for repeating myself on this one, but I'm a proponent of
blocking outright on SBL. There's a good reason for spammers to be in
their list, and it's not some community project where anyone and
everyone makes nominations, so it's practically flawless.
Another trick for Green Horse is
23 matches
Mail list logo
