I am still see lots of these in my logs (v1.78i4):
=
02/29/2004 02:35:34 Qc0656280009442df Unknown Var: %TESTNAMEX-RBL-Warni
X-RBL-Warning: %TESTNAMEX-RBL-
Could you E-mail me one of your log files (off-list), so that I can check
it out in more detail? The latest interim has some extra code
I've setup a gateway mailserver using postfix and amavisd. I want to make
sure that the IP for this gateway server is skipped, but I'm kinda confused
since the postfix box hands off the message a few times. Below are the
received headers from one of the messages, and also what I put in my
I've setup a gateway mailserver using postfix and amavisd. I want to make
sure that the IP for this gateway server is skipped, but I'm kinda
confused since the postfix box hands off the message a few times. Below
are the received headers from one of the messages, and also what I put in
my
At 09:09 AM 3/1/2004, R. Scott Perry wrote:
I've setup a gateway mailserver using postfix and amavisd. I want to
make sure that the IP for this gateway server is skipped, but I'm kinda
confused since the postfix box hands off the message a few times. Below
are the received headers from one
Have you tried an on-line virus scan?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerod Bennett
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 11:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Hi. This message failed the SORBS-DUHL test even though a lookup at SORBS
of the IP address revealed all clean.
Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks.
Received: from mail.ittint.net [130.94.242.170] by mail.electdist.com with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.05) id A52D91B0108; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 11:55:25
Resolved 130.94.242.170 to mail.ittint.net.
mail.ittint.net. has no MX records - [ittint.net has 1 MX record
mail.ittint.net.(10)]
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Gable
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 5:58 PM
To: Declude
Hi. This message
failed the SORBS-DUHL test even though a lookup at SORBS of the IP address
revealed all clean.
Any insight would be
appreciated. Thanks.
-Mike
http://www.dnsbl.us.sorbs.net
Received: from mail.ittint.net [130.94.242.170] by
mail.electdist.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05)
The issue here is that while 130.94.242.170 isn't listed in SORBS-DUHL,
4.4.24.79 is. So if you are using a HOP setting other than 0, 4.4.24.79
gets scanned. If you rename the test to SORBS-DUL, it will be skipped
(or you can upgrade to the latest beta, which will skip if automatically).
In
I've been seeing a ton of spam getting relayed by a zombie, open proxy
or source through mailforward.bulkregister.com [65.109.255.4] for at
least a week now. Does anyone know what purpose this server has besides
forwarding spam? Any BulkRegister customers want to help by notifying
the proper
Oh wait, I figured it out.
This server is a great IPBYPASS candidate. It's some sort of domain
mail forwarding that Bulk Register offers. The sudden occurrence
corresponded with me picking up a new client that was using this
forwarding service.
IPBYPASS 65.109.255.4
Matt
Matt wrote:
11 matches
Mail list logo
