authenticate using a Windows 2000
user account, in my case only a few users need to use my second SMTP so i use
the same user account for all of them
Sincerely,William J. Baumbach II [EMAIL PROTECTED]9975 Pennsylvania
Ave. Manassas, Va. 20110-2028Ph: 703-367-7900 ext:1708 Fax:
703-691-0946-
- Original Message -
From:
marc catuogno
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:39
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Port
25
Forgive my ignorance
but how does this work with security? What do you, or your users,
authenticate on?
-Original
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William BaumbachSent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:27
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Port
25
I have COX and they
blocked port 25 a long time ago, this then required me to send all outgoing
email through COX SMTP server.
so i could send email
from home COX to my own SMTP email server, my work around to this was to
I have a Windows 2000
server on a T-1 with Imail / Declude on port 25, and the SMTP build-in to IIS
on port 26, so i have two SMTP servers on the same PC. the IIS SMTP on port 26
just forwardes all email to Imail / Declude on port
25.
for info on how to
run both MS SMTP and IMail on a Win2000 server see bottom of
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19990809-DM01.htm
Sincerely,William J. Baumbach
II [EMAIL PROTECTED]9975
Pennsylvania Ave. Manassas, Va. 20110-2028Ph: 703-367-7900 ext:1708 Fax:
703-691-0946-
- Original
Message -
From: Frederick Samarelli
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Wednesday, March 17, 2004 12:23 AM
Subject:
[Declude.JunkMail] Port 25
Can IMAIL be
configured to both port 25 and another.
If not can my Cisco
Router be configured to do this.
Fred
- Original
Message -
From: Dave Doherty
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Wednesday, March 17, 2004 12:08 AM
Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail] Comcast Update
Hi
Matt-
click... click...
click...
So here we go again. The
old broken record.
IfComcast and
RoadRunnerblocked port 25, they would be down many millions of
messages per day.
If you really feel the
need to provide outbound mail service for your clients, why not do it on a
different port and instruct them to use that port? It's exceedingly easy
to do, even in Outlook Express.
Not trying to pick an
argument here, but ya gotta admit that stopping millions of messages a day
is worth a little effort.
-Dave
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Tuesday, March 16, 2004 11:08 PM
Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail] Comcast Update
If my memory serves me right, there was a little
more than 14,000 mail hosts identified in SenderBase for comcast.net
exactly one month ago. Guess what... http://www.senderbase.org/search?searchString=comcast.netI
believe that says 26,217, over a 90% increase in the last
month.That's not really all that fair because of the virus storm
and propagation can set off SenderBase. They still though have
many, many customers recording rates suggestive of up to 1 million
messages a day.Road Runner (rr.com) is actually up about 130% in
the same period, but I think that just goes to show you that they were
working harder to begin with and RR customers are just as foolish as
Comcast customers are when it comes to executing
viruses.MattColbeck, Andrew
wrote:So far, it's bull. After 1 week, my logs show no reduction in junk trafficfrom ComCast reverse DNS addresses.Andrew 8)-Original Message-From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 7:02 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Comcast UpdateBull dookie, sounds like lip-service to me :)MattDan Patnode wrote:
Seems they're actually aware of the problem:http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/2004/03/10/comcast/index.php?redirect=1 0
78943859000---[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
