[Declude.JunkMail] Thank You SNIFFER!!

2004-12-03 Thread Jeff Pereira
I installed SNIFFER the other night   SNIFFER worked so well the first night that I installed it that I checked my mail server logs because I thought that my mail server must have been down for most of the night.   Instead of the usual 50-75 SPAM messages that I was accustomed to receiving,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS and "No Reverse DNS"

2004-12-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
Would this alternative filter work? TESTSFAILED END NOTCONTAINS REVDNS MAILFROM 1 ENDSWITH.msn.com # ok it is from msn and there is no revdns Ah, good thinking -- that should work. You might also want to add a line: REVDNS END CONTAINS.msn.com to make sure that the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS and "No Reverse DNS"

2004-12-03 Thread Nick
On 3 Dec 2004 at 9:59, Dan Geiser wrote: Dan - Would this alternative filter work? TESTSFAILED END NOTCONTAINS REVDNS MAILFROM 1 ENDSWITH.msn.com # ok it is from msn and there is no revdns -Nick > > Scott, > When using the SPAMDOMAINS test we have the option to put a strin

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS and "No Reverse DNS"

2004-12-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have a couple of SPAMDOMAINS where I would like to have "No Reverse DNS" be a viable alternative to the domain but still block on everything else. Can I just put that string "No Reverse DNS" in second column to pass through domains which only match "domain.com" and "No Reverse DNS"? Unfortun

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] External rule not weighting properly

2004-12-03 Thread Dean Lawrence
Scott, Thanks for you help. I was mis-reading the configuration. In the default configs the passing of NOLEGITCONTENT has a negative weight of 5 which was offsetting the results. Also, since it passed the test, it was not showing up in the headers either. Duh!! Dean _

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] External rule not weighting properly

2004-12-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SNIFFER-EXPERIMENTAL-ABSTRACT, SPFUNKNOWN [0] As you can see it failed these two tests, but the weight should be 5. Any thoughts on why this is not working properly? It is working properly. If you remove those two tests, you'll see that the weight of the E-mail is -5 (due to

[Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS and "No Reverse DNS"

2004-12-03 Thread Dan Geiser
Scott, When using the SPAMDOMAINS test we have the option to put a string in the second column which will also pass the test, e.g...   .hotmail.com   .msn.com   like ".msn.com" is in the above example.   I have a couple of SPAMDOMAINS where I would like to have "No Reverse DNS" be a viable a

[Declude.JunkMail] External rule not weighting properly

2004-12-03 Thread Dean Lawrence
I added some new sniffer classification rules to my global config file, but my weighting does not seem to work for them. My config lines look like this: SNIFFER-GENERAL external060 "C:\IMail\Declude\Sniffer\whmepypa.exe Authcode" 5 0 SNIFFER-EXPERIMENTAL-ABSTRACT external