Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam not being marked

2005-07-13 Thread Mike Hyslip
I'm not real sure here either way. I think I had 1.88 installed or so, then checked for an update and installed 2.0.6 As far as I know the config's are the defaults that came with 2.0.6 with my key/serial added. I'll try commenting out the existing and add the section that was posted with a we

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update

2005-07-13 Thread Mailing Lists
Also I hope the issue of orphaned emails is being addressed with Declude and SM.   This is a real pain, we had to go to back to Declude 2.0.5.76 because 2.0.6 release would break up the hdr and eml files (so you would get orphaned hdr in the /proc and .eml in the spool). 2.0.5.76 doesnt chec

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelistfile

2005-07-13 Thread kztechinfo - cribellum
Read the release notes again and see it was put in version 1.66. Thanks for your help. Keith Zwick Cribellum, LLC 248-596-1901 ex301 - Original Message - From: "Goran Jovanovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 2:13 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelistf

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelistfile

2005-07-13 Thread kztechinfo - cribellum
Thanks Goran, That helped. Do you know if the WHITELISTFILE command works in 1.82. I am waiting on upgrading to 2 until things get more stable. Keith Zwick Cribellum, LLC 248-596-1901 ex301 - Original Message - From: "Goran Jovanovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, Ju

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelistfile

2005-07-13 Thread Goran Jovanovic
I will throw in a couple of cents worth (but CDN so perhaps less than others :) ) All the mail that I process I gateway. So in each domain directory I have a $default$.junkmail file and in each one of those I have the following two lines added WHITELISTFILE C:\IMail\Declude\Filters\GlobalWhiteL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam not being marked

2005-07-13 Thread Matt
I believe that was a byproduct of changes earlier in the 2.x releases, but it was fixed in 2.0.6. Much of this appearantly had to do with how they had changed the behavior of the DELETE action, but in 2.0.6 they set it back to the original behavior and created a new action with the new functio

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAIN and IPBYPASS

2005-07-13 Thread Matt
IPBYPASS works consistantly across the board.  So any hop that is bypassed will not figure into any IP based test of any sort, and it will make the source IP the first IP that wasn't bypassed. Matt John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote: Anybody? John T eServices For You -Origina

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelistfile

2005-07-13 Thread kztechinfo - cribellum
Scott, From what I read DOMAINWHITELIST does not whitelist the domain using it but allow you to add a whitelist file to the domains directory that lists (the IP address, E-mail address, etc.) to be whitelisted. Keith Zwick Cribellum, LLC 248-596-1901 ex301 - Original Message - From

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAIN and IPBYPASS

2005-07-13 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Anybody? John T eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 7:44 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAIN and IPBYPA

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelistfile

2005-07-13 Thread Scott Fisher
I'll add my 2cents worth. I don't whitelist by domain name because these can be easily forged by spammers and/or virus zombies. - Original Message - From: "kztechinfo - cribellum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 11:20 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitel

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelistfile

2005-07-13 Thread kztechinfo - cribellum
Thanks Darrell, I had found that archive. I guess I was a little confused because if you enable DOMAINWHITLIST then you put a file whitelist.txt in the users domain directory or the other way is to put a whitelistfile entry into the domain.junkmail.txt file with a whateverfilename.txt in the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam not being marked

2005-07-13 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Their has also been talk on the list in the past about weights that conflict and Weight ranges clears a log of this stuff up WEIGHT10weightrange x x 10 13 WEIGHT14weightrange x x 14 19 WEIGHT20weight x x 20

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelistfile

2005-07-13 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Keith, The way this message reads - http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg21038.html It appears as its a "either or" so for example if you have the DOMAINWHITELISTS ON than you do not have to have the entry in the domains default.junkmail file. Or you can have the entr

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelistfile

2005-07-13 Thread kztechinfo - cribellum
Hi, I am currently using Declude Junkmail 1.82 and am looking at adding the WHITELISTFILE option. I checked the release notes and it says it was added in beta for 1.78 but it lists: DOMAINWHITELISTS ON option, to allow for per-domain whitelist files at \IMail\Declude\example.com\whitelist.t

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update

2005-07-13 Thread Bill Billman
Thanks Mike. We are making great progress.  We’ve managed to address the issues and make Declude far more efficient.  Internal testing is beginning.  I believe that you will be pleased with the performance and resource utilization of this version.  Too early for me to make specific claims