Welcome to Notepad!
I've also been looking for a utility to do this, but haven't found it yet.
Spam Review was recommended to me, but I was disappointed to find out that it
only works with IMail - not SmarterMail. You can download it here -
http://www.sunlightsoftware.com/spamreview.htm
The
I installed Junkmail Pro today as a trial with smartermail. I have a fair
number of spams that have been held and I need a means to review them and to
identify false positives. How do most of you review the spam in the hold
queue?
I seem to recall a utility, I think it was called spamreview, whi
Also, Dan, are you running Hijack?
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005
3:00 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Problem with Dec
As promised Declude Beta 3.0.2.1 for Imail Available for Download
Slight difference in operation as to the previous Declude 3.0.12
Messages are now processed in a \Work Directory which is created under the
\Proc directory, the proc directory now contains messages waiting to be
processed, in effec
Dan,
Restarting IMail's Queue Manager service, or rebooting an IMail server
without stopping the SMTP service can cause spam to be grabbed and
delivered by the Queue Manager without being processed by Declude. You
might want to check for that.
Matt
Dan Horne wrote:
John Tolmachoff (Lis
John Tolmachoff (Lists) <> wrote on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 2:11 PM:
> Dan, I am at a client right now so I do not have the time to review
> all, but could it be an old Imail issue where since the Declude
> process was having an issue, the QueueManager did a batch run and
> grabbed the message be
Title: Help with Whitelisting
Great, thanks Matt.
Now I've got Cat Scratch Fever!
Andrew 8)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MattSent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 1:45 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help
wit
Title: Help with Whitelisting
ha!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MattSent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 1:45 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help
with Whitelisting
Microsoft outsourced much of their support
Title: Help with Whitelisting
Microsoft outsourced much of their support to China and India (the
source of this message), and finding a reverse DNS entry in these
countries is like finding a peace activist at a Ted Nugent concert.
Matt
Agid, Corby wrote:
The orginal reason fo
Title: Help with Whitelisting
The orginal reason for my posting was that messages I
received from mssupport.microsoft.com were getting caught in my filter because,
among other things, the sending server had no reverse dns. My headers and
diagnostic are at the very bottom of this posting. I
Title: Help with Whitelisting
That indeed clears things up for me. If it's
indeed a right handed text match, then of course my entry wouldn't work as
originally configured and would also explain some problems I have with a couple
of other domains. I had thought it was domain
matching.
T
Title: Help with Whitelisting
All it's saying is to put one entry per
line, and the available entry formats are the three described.
Not surprising that MS may have reverse DNS
misconfigured, but what leads you to believe it is?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Agid, Corby
To
Title: Help with Whitelisting
Yes, it would help if the manual added something
like:
"The line you create in the whitelist text file will be
used in a text match to the MAILFROM address of each message that
is received".
That's already wordy and doesn't mention that the match is
a right-
Title: Help with Whitelisting
That's what I would have thought, but the manual is a
bit confusing. Here's from the
manual:
=
"The
D:\{MAILSERVER}\Declude\mywhitelist.txt file would then contain either
one E-mail address ("[EMAIL PROTECTED]") or domain ("@example.com") or subdomain
(".
Serge,
Their are no issues with DLAnalyzer with version 2.0.x. Make sure you check
the website support page and verify your logging levels are what we
recommend for max report coverage (i.e. different reports require different
log levels).
Darrell
--
I will be posting a new decludeproc.exe Beta 3.0.21 before the end of today.
The new one should:
* take care of the orphaned files in the proc directory
* improve on performance
* deal with the sm$ files
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
also, what about log format
i curently use DLA and VLA
do i need to change the log generation options ?
- Original Message -
From: "Serge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 6:24 PM
Subject: Upgrading from 1.81
> Been away for some time, and was not regulary readin
Been away for some time, and was not regulary reading this list.
I am getting ready to upgrade from 1.81 to a new version .
need some advice.
1- Do i need to run the installer with all 2.0.x versions ? or can i do it
the old way (get a declude.exe and copy it)
2- What version do you recommend ? 2.
Dan, I am at a client right now so I do not have the time to review all, but
could it be an old Imail issue where since the Declude process was having an
issue, the QueueManager did a batch run and grabbed the message before
Declude finished it?
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message--
> It has now been an hour and the decludeproc service has only processed
> around 1000 objects, which I believe corresponds to 500 messages. I
> created the declude.cfg and put in THREADS 25. I also dl'ed the newer
> decludeproc.exe, but when I went to stop the service so I could replace
> it, th
Nick Hayer <> wrote on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:57 AM:
> Dan,
>
> Do you believe the slowness you are experiencing is for sure related
> to this decludeproc.exe [will this work on any declude ver?] or maybe
> other causes unrelated like dns issue or a traffic spike?
>
> -Nick
>
No definit
Dan Horne <> wrote on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:57 AM:
> I received ...
Just wanted to let everyone know that this problem occurred and this
message was sent before I found out about the service stopping
(discussed in another thread). However, that doesn't seem to be related
to this message, wh
I received a spam message in my inbox this morning. Looking at the
headers, it doesn't appear that it was ever scanned by Declude. Running
the 3 beta here. I searched through the Imail logs and found the queue
number, then searched the Declude Junkmail log for that. I set my logs
to DEBUG for t
Title: Help with Whitelisting
Almost. Your entry would match anything that
ends with ".mssupport.microsoft.com",
but since "@mssupport.microsoft.com" does not contain
the leading period, it doesn't match.
In your case, you probably want two
lines
.mssupport.microsoft.com
@mssupport.mic
Title: Help with Whitelisting
Wouldn't my whitelist entry also whitelist all
senders from .msssupport.microsoft.com and any subdomains of
mssupport.microsoft.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
CoxSent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:43 AMTo:
Nick,
1. I am not aware of any functionality that is in 2.0.6.16 that does not
work in Declude Beta 3.0
2. All the functionality that was in 2.0.6.16 is included in Declude 3.0
Beta
3. All the functionality that was in 2.0.6.16 should work in Declude 3.0
Beta, but this is the reason for a Beta
Title: Help with Whitelisting
Because the mail is from @mssupport.microsoft.com,
but you're not whitelisting @mssupport.microsoft.com, you're whitelisting
.mssupport.microsoft.com.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Agid, Corby
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, Au
"should" is my question. I was just looking for a confirmation as to
what I would be changing to.
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
"All functionality that existed in 2.0.6.16 should be in Declude 3.0 Beta
the main difference is that fact that we have a decludeproc.exe which now
runs as a service."
D
"All functionality that existed in 2.0.6.16 should be in Declude 3.0 Beta
the main difference is that fact that we have a decludeproc.exe which now
runs as a service."
David B
www.declude.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hay
Just as a note, sometimes the decludeproc.exe can take a while to shut down
as it has to clear out all the threads and wait on messages it is still
processing - perhaps waiting for a virus scan to finish etc.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMA
Hi David -
David Barker wrote:
I am not sure exactly what you are asking, could you be more specific as to
your question regarding 2.0.6.16 ?
well the release ver is I believe 2.0.6 and the interim is 2.0.6.16. My
question was does the 3.0 beta have the 2.0.6.16 interim features
includ
Title: Help with Whitelisting
Hello,
I am attempting to whitelist a couple of sending domains, but my whitelisting doesn't seem to work. I'm including the headers and the corresponding entries from my whitelist. Please help me figure out why the messages are not getting whitelisted.
T
David Barker <> wrote on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:42 AM:
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> I have posted decludeproc.exe 3.0.12 which should take care of the
> issue of decludeproc stopping on its own.
>
> Also remember you can increase the number of THREADS in your
> declude.cfg, the default i
Dan,
Do you believe the slowness you are experiencing is for sure related to
this decludeproc.exe [will this work on any declude ver?] or maybe other
causes unrelated like dns issue or a traffic spike?
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
Thanks for the feedback.
I have posted decludeproc.exe 3.0.
The version number is derived from the decludeproc.exe
All functionality that existed in 2.0.6.16 should be in Declude 3.0 the main
diffence is that fact that we have a decludeproc.exe which now runs as a
service.
I am not sure exactly what you are asking, could you be more specific as to
your qu
David -
Would you kindly confirm exactly what version of Declude this 3.0 beta
is derived from? Is it 2.0.6.16 ?
Thanks
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
Thanks for the feedback.
I have posted decludeproc.exe 3.0.12 which should take care of the issue of
decludeproc stopping on its own.
Also
Thanks for the feedback.
I have posted decludeproc.exe 3.0.12 which should take care of the issue of
decludeproc stopping on its own.
Also remember you can increase the number of THREADS in your declude.cfg,
the default is 5 you should be able to move this up to 25 quite easily or
even double it
OK, I sent a message to the list this morning, went into an hourlong
meeting and came back out to find that the message hadn't posted to the
list yet. Also people were complaining about their email "not working".
I found that the Decludeproc service had stopped on its own. The event
log shows eve
38 matches
Mail list logo
