[Declude.JunkMail] credit or punish these lists?

2006-04-10 Thread Nick Hayer
I have trouble deciding if these are generally good or bad lists - do any of you block them with certainty? Thanks -Nick biglist.com internetcrusade.com rmxx.com edxx.com [both of the above replace the xx with 01,02,03,etc..] roving/constantcontact --- This E-mail came from the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] credit or punish these lists?

2006-04-10 Thread Scott Fisher
I haven't received anything blatant spammy from biglist/rm##/ed##/roving/constantcontact in March. Certainly chunks of B2B email from known companies. So they are hammy enough that they would be part of my automated ham IP list and get a -50 applied to them. If there were spam complaints, I'd

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] invURIBL

2006-04-10 Thread Imail Admin
Based on the discussion under Declude JM, I'm also looking at adding invURIBL. However, I find the weighting system in the invurible.exe.config file very confusing. This is the total weight passed to Declude? I can't figure out what typical weight scores would be or how to adjust them. Just

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] invURIBL

2006-04-10 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Based on the discussion under Declude JM, I'm also looking at adding invURIBL. However, I find the weighting system in the invurible.exe.config file very confusing. This is the total weight passed to Declude? I can't figure out what typical weight scores would be or how to adjust them. Ben