David,
The open relay test is at www.dnsreport.com.
Todd
- Original Message -
From: David Dodell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 10:14 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] open relay tester
I have a customer who claims that their exchange box is
Does Declude use the SPEWS DNSBL by
default?spews.orgsays you can use there dnsbl through relays.osirusoft.comwhich I
knowDeclude uses.I don't know if I have to configure something
differentto use the SPEWS dnsbl. It looks like it may be a good list
to use
We are holding by WEIGHT 12 and I
Darrel,
Add me to you list. I would love to be able to get some of this info.
Todd
- Original Message -
From: Darrell LaRock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 4:06 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Report System
Terry,
I used delog for
FYI Spamdomians failed this. Which it
should have based on my SP entry ofcom.although it was a valid
email. Its an invoice sent by someone to my client though intuits online
invoicing system.
What is everyone using for "com."
Received: from mail2.smart-mail.net [65.16.167.134]
by
I am using the HOP 1 setting and recently tried to use the IPBYPASS and
found it did not work for me either. Declude was still using the servers I
had listed as bypass for its tests.
I have two separate internet connections with a NAV SMTP Gateway on each
forwarding to IMail. I entered an
We have been tuning our Declude
over the past couple months. We have added some of the new tests and also
started using Spamcheck.
So far this month we have held
over 17k spam emails in less than 14 days. Last month we held 24k spam
emails for the entire month. That means on average we
I know there were some posts
about this a while back but I cannot find what I am looking for now in my
Declude mailbox.
We hold all spam, delete
nothing. Spam is held in the D:\IMail\spool\spam dir and we use Mail
Review to go though looking for FPs. I would like to hold higher weighted
My Declude config has grown
since install. I am curious if it is possible determine a Weight at which
Declude ceases running tests on an email.
SayI have40
testsand after Declude runsthe first 10 of themit accumulates
ascore of 300.IHOLD at 100.Further testing
beyond 300uses additional
John,
As I mentioned, the order that
you ran the tests would affect the outcome. Tests that generate a
negative weight would need to be run first, such as IPNOTINMX, BONDEDSENDER, and
other whitelist type of tests. Also the reason I suggested stopping
testing at weigh 3x my HOLD weight.
The ISP can also use it as selling factor to get businesses to host on Their
servers rather than an outside provider that is now perceived as having
difficulties getting the customers email to function properly.
Todd
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Maze - Hostmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and since SBC is obviously not an ethical
alternative,
Whets using SBC as a provider got to do with ethics?
Todd
- Original Message -
From: Phillip B. Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 8:47 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM
Spam we caught yesterday was down by about 30% -
40%. Anyone else notice this?
Todd Hunter
Progressive Systems
Greg,
we have been using SpamCheck for about 1 1/2 months now and have had No
problems with it.
Pros
1. Easy to Install
2. Support has been good
3. Highly flexible
4. Catches a lot of spam that passes DNS and RFC tests
5. Allows you to give emails + or - weights
6. Cost $0
Cons
1. Config
- Original Message -
From:
Todd - Smart
Mail
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:04
AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Setting
MAX Testing Weight
John,
As I mentioned, the order that
you ran the tests would affect the outcome. Tests
Title: Message
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/got.you.hoax.html
Its a Hoax.
Todd Hunter
Progressive Systems
- Original Message -
From:
Jeff Maze - Hostmaster
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 8:03
PM
Subject:
I would like to see an updated list also.
Todd
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 3:56 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS
Any one have an updated list to share?
John Tolmachoff MCSE
Went to comment out this test today and then decided to check their site.
They look to be in full swing. My delude log show its working as well.
Todd Hunter
Progressive Systems
Better Networks by Design
- Original Message -
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was curious if anyone has seen a message like
this. My brother is getting this bounce when sending through Quest to some
of his recipients. I assume that what is happening is that the Quest mail
server is blacklisted by the remote mail server?
---
- Original
If you are using raid then the Adaptec 2120S is a good unit. We
have used Adaptec for years and they are solid controllers. We have had
some small problems where 2120S cards are finicky with certain drives
and bios revisions. Particularly the Seagate drives so be careful. They
also have
We have used the Comodo/Instant SSL Certs and they have worked fine.
Yes you have to install the additional cert but once done everything
works as it should.
Todd Hunter
Smart Mail
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
Sent:
We just started getting hit with this new Bagle.az. Anyone else seeing it?
McAfee has defs but Symantec
doesnt yet.
Just started getting calls within
the last hour.
Todd Hunter
Smart Mail.
21 matches
Mail list logo
