and don't tell me you wouldn't do the same...
That's a curious sentiment to post on an anti-spam list! I'd have
hoped everyone here believes we should be regulated by ethics as well
as statutes. Otherwise, why aren't we spamming for a living?
As the three-way rubber-stamping between DoC,
: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...
That's a curious sentiment to post on an anti-spam list! I'd have
hoped everyone here believes we should be regulated by ethics as well
as statutes. Otherwise, why aren't we spamming for a living?
As the three-way rubber
most big corporations put their bottomline before anything... case
in point, Worldcom , Enron etc. etc. to name a few get my drift?
Those are cases of high-dollar abuse, and of course there are
thousands of smaller-time abuses going on all the time. My
disagreement
Don't hold your breath, though.
ICANN has a way of spinning things, so it looks like they are doing
the right thing. A good recent example is WLS. They initially came
out against WLS, but later and in spite of overwhelming opposition
from the Internet Community and contrary to the
, 2003 5:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...
Don't hold your breath, though.
ICANN has a way of spinning things, so it looks like they are doing
the right thing. A good recent example is WLS. They initially came
out against WLS, but later and in spite
days are here again...
I could not be happier...
http://www.icann.org/correspondence/twomey-to-lewis-03oct03.htm
--
Joshua Levitsky, CISSP, MCSE
System Engineer
AOL Time Warner
[5957 F27C 9C71 E9A7 274A 0447 C9B9 75A4 9B41 D4D1]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...
Todd Holt wrote:
IMHO, ICANN should send a bill to VeriSlime for the registration of
all
combinations which could be caught by the wildcard. Does anyone know
the maximum length
Umm, I think you missed a zero somewhere... ;-)
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Bramble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...
Todd Holt wrote:
IMHO, ICANN should send
702.319.4349
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...
Todd Holt wrote
days are here again...
I could not be happier...
http://www.icann.org/correspondence/twomey-to-lewis-03oct03.htm
--
Joshua Levitsky, CISSP, MCSE
System Engineer
AOL Time Warner
[5957 F27C 9C71 E9A7 274A 0447 C9B9 75A4 9B41 D4D1]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
USAwww.xidix.com702.319.4349
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matthew BrambleSent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:54 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...Todd Holt wrote:
IMHO, ICANN should send
Todd Holt wrote:
So, ICANN
comes up with a figure that is
equal to the cost of maintaining the internet for a year and each
registrar
pays a percentage of that figure based on the percentage of all
registrations
that they manage?
Exactly.
If
12 matches
Mail list logo
