In reviewing message headers, I see lines like this:
X-RBL-Warning: FILTERS: Message failed FILTERS test (line 86, weight 10)
Since I often change filter files, knowing that the failed filter was - at
some time in the past - on line 86 is meaningless unless I always add new
filters at the bottom
Unfortunately, we probably won't be able to make such a change. In this
case, you should check the Declude JunkMail log file for further
details. The problem is that if the E-mail fails multiple lines in the
filter file, or if the search term is very long, it can make for very long
and
reporting improvement idea
In reviewing message headers, I see lines like this:
X-RBL-Warning: FILTERS: Message failed FILTERS test (line 86, weight 10)
Since I often change filter files, knowing that the failed filter was - at
some time in the past - on line 86 is meaningless unless I always
on 7/14/04 12:41 PM, Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
Dave, if you move your reporting level from MID to HIGH, you will see a log
line for every hit in your filter files.
Your log files will also be 5 times larger.
What you want to see used to be viewable at loglevel mid but was changed for
some
: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 12:41 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter reporting improvement idea
Dave, if you move your reporting level from MID to HIGH, you will see a
log
line for every hit in your filter files.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: Dave Doherty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
