Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter reporting improvement idea

[R. Scott Perry]

Unfortunately, we probably won't be able to make such a change.  In this 
case, you should check the Declude JunkMail log file for further 
details.  The problem is that if the E-mail fails multiple lines in the 
filter file, or if the search term is very long, it can make for very long 
and confusing E-mail headers.
                                        -Scott

At 10:53 AM 7/14/2004, Dave Doherty wrote:
In reviewing message headers, I see lines like this:
X-RBL-Warning: FILTERS: Message failed FILTERS test (line 86, weight 10)
Since I often change filter files, knowing that the failed filter was - at
some time in the past - on line 86 is meaningless unless I always add new
filters at the bottom of the list. This seems counterproductive, since the
current stuff should always be at the top to improve processing efficiency.
Can this be changed to show something like:
X-RBL-Warning: FILTERS: Message failed FILTERS test ("REVDNS  10 ENDSWITH
couponcall.net")
or is there a variable that can be used to generate such a report?
I think this would be at lot more useful in troubleshooting, particularly
for FPs.
-Dave Doherty
 Skywaves, Inc.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.