Fisher
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 5:30 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
I don't have the order... But I believe filters are done last after External
comments.
If David's monitoring the list,
I think a list of what order the tests
Thanks David. It's good to have you monitoring the list.
- Original Message -
From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 10:26 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
Scott,
I agree, unfortunately I do
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
It would be nice if there was a directive that forced the tests to run as
they are in the order of which the appear in the CONFIG file. I know this
may/would be a performance decrease but it would give end users
Wow, that would be great! :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 9:38 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
Erik,
I have also asked
control of
external tests.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 3:23 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
Erik wrote:
If Declude
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 4:10 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
Erik,
Flexibility is a nice thing
in
version 1.62 in November 2002.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 3:30 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
I don't have the order
, September 17, 2005 2:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
From our testing of our new external program, you are right. The external
program is being called before our combo filter is being triggered.
And the %COUNTRYCHAIN% variable is blank. So this variable
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 2:23 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
I believe the order is: IP4R RHSBL, Declude Internal, spamdomains,
Extermal, Fromfile, IPFile, Filter
Within
Erik wrote:
If Declude could confirm the order of how/which tests are run, it would be
nice to know.
I agree.
The archives may help but as I recall Scott [former of Declude] was
nebulous in what the order is. The only thing for sure was filters ran
last in the order listed in global.cfg
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 3:23 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
Erik wrote:
If Declude could confirm the order of how/which tests are run, it would
be nice to know.
I
decrease but it would give end users control of
external tests.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 3:23 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 2:23 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
I believe the order is: IP4R RHSBL, Declude Internal, spamdomains,
Extermal, Fromfile, IPFile, Filter
:08 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
One more comment. The country processing won't occur unless you have the
all_list.dat file in the declude folder.
- Original Message -
From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail
Could someone help me in creating a filter?
I need something to this effect. Can this be done in one filter?
If WEIGHT = 100 or Higher then END
If TESTFAILED CONTAINS MN-COMBO Then
If CountryChain NOTCONTAINS UNITED STATES Then
Then DELETE (triggers the filter - return 100 as
@declude.com
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 12:45 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
Could someone help me in creating a filter?
I need something to this effect. Can this be done in one filter?
If WEIGHT = 100 or Higher then END
If TESTFAILED CONTAINS MN-COMBO
12:57 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
I think this would do it in two filters:
filter 1:
SKIPIFWEIGHT 100
TESTSFAILED END NOTCONTAINS MN-COMBO
COUNTRIES 100 NOTCONTAINS US
filter 2:
SKIPIFWEIGHT 100
TESTSFAILED END NOTCONTAINS MN
, 2005 12:57 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
I think this would do it in two filters:
filter 1:
SKIPIFWEIGHT 100
TESTSFAILED END NOTCONTAINS MN-COMBO
COUNTRIES 100 NOTCONTAINS US
filter 2:
SKIPIFWEIGHT 100
TESTSFAILED END
Multicast
*P APNIC Unlisted (Asia Pacific)
*R IANA Reserved
*U Unknown
- Original Message - From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 12:45 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
Could someone help me in creating
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 2:31 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
Just to second this - I have seen a large amount of customers also farm out
filtering to companies
Does anyone know (Darrell); if the %COUNTRYCHAIN% can be passed to an
external program? I've thought of developing an EXE that does this final
scan after MN-COMBO is tested.
It should be - at this point any variable I have messed with has been
passable to an external test.
Darrell
---
]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 3:44 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
We've been monitoring the MN-COMBO test (multiple tests failed) for the past
2 months.
Most are failing INV-URIBL and SNIFFER; but some only failing one of them
(either SNIFFER or INV
22 matches
Mail list logo
