Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Increase in porn?

2004-07-21 Thread Robert Whitaker
I filter on the picture name and url in the mail. Then I route the img source address to a null route so the customer will not see the image. Just the holder in the message. It helps on alot of these type of messages that have gotten thru. Robert -- Original Message --

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Increase in porn?

2004-07-21 Thread Pete McNeil
On Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 12:27:00 PM, Grant wrote: GGDJ> Yep, usually has to do something with video type stuff. The good news is that in the last two rounds of updates I've done I saw no more of this guys trash - so I think we've put a hurtin' on him. The bad news is that he is probably the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Increase in porn?

2004-07-21 Thread Rick Davidson
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 12:19 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Increase in porn? > yes a large amount...thought it might just be my config... > > > gb > > At 11:27 AM 7/21/2004 -0400, you wrote: > > > >Are any of you seeing a

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Increase in porn?

2004-07-21 Thread Pete McNeil
On Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 11:39:43 AM, Grant wrote: GGDJ> We are also seeing these very heavy the past few weeks. I forward them to GGDJ> the spam@ for sniffer on a regular basis, but they still seem to get thru on GGDJ> a regular basis. No solutions here... I've checked both of your account

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Increase in porn?

2004-07-21 Thread Grant Griffith - Declude JM
, July 21, 2004 11:30 AM To: Woody G. Fussell Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Increase in porn? On Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 11:27:33 AM, Woody wrote: WGF> Are any of you seeing an increase in explicit porn getting past Declude and WGF> Sniffer in the past few days. WGF> We are seeing a d

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Increase in porn?

2004-07-21 Thread Glenn Brooks
yes a large amount...thought it might just be my config... gb At 11:27 AM 7/21/2004 -0400, you wrote: Are any of you seeing an increase in explicit porn getting past Declude and Sniffer in the past few days. We are seeing a disturbing increase that will only fail some minor weighted test such as b

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Increase in porn?

2004-07-21 Thread Pete McNeil
On Wednesday, July 21, 2004, 11:27:33 AM, Woody wrote: WGF> Are any of you seeing an increase in explicit porn getting past Declude and WGF> Sniffer in the past few days. WGF> We are seeing a disturbing increase that will only fail some minor weighted WGF> test such as bad routing and often fail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Increase in porn?

2004-07-21 Thread Markus Gufler
> Are any of you seeing an increase in explicit porn getting > past Declude and Sniffer in the past few days. No. Normaly 5 to 10 messages per month finish in my mailbox. I can't remember one with pornographic content. > Any suggestions on how to get ahead of these guys and reduce > such ema

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Increase in porn?

2004-07-21 Thread Grant Griffith - Declude JM
://www.getafreewebsite.com 877-483-3393 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Woody G. Fussell Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 10:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Increase in porn? Are any of you seeing an increase in explicit porn getting past

[Declude.JunkMail] Increase in porn?

2004-07-21 Thread Woody G. Fussell
Are any of you seeing an increase in explicit porn getting past Declude and Sniffer in the past few days. We are seeing a disturbing increase that will only fail some minor weighted test such as bad routing and often fail no test. They are almost dynamically changing the spelling of the obvious