[Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB Hotmail

2005-03-29 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi; Am I imagining things or Declude.mtldb has listed a Hotmail ip address in the blacklist? X-RBL-Warning: [DECLUDE.ip4r.MTLDB]: "IP is listed in MTLDB" Spamcop has also that IP listed.. X-RBL-Warning: [SPAMCOP.ip4r]: "Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?64.4.61.200" The

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB Hotmail

2005-03-29 Thread Kim Premuda
We've been having problems with MTLDB doing the same thing...started around 8:00A PST (California, US). -- Original Message -- From: Kami Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:06:14 -0500 Hi; Am I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB Hotmail

2005-03-29 Thread Scott Fisher
Has the effectiveness of the MTLDB improved at all? I stopped using it months ago because of rampant false positives. - Original Message - From: Kami Razvan To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 4:06 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB

[Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB?

2004-08-27 Thread Hirthe, Alexander
Hello, how high is your weight for this test? do you have FPs? Alex --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB?

2004-08-27 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, August 27, 2004, 3:19:37 AM, Alexander wrote: HA Hello, HA how high is your weight for this test? do you have FPs? I recommend referencing this analysis which suggests MTLB is probably not ready yet: http://www2.spamchk.com/public.html This seems to be consistent with comments on

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB?

2004-08-27 Thread Markus Gufler
I recommend referencing this analysis which suggests MTLB is probably not ready yet: http://www2.spamchk.com/public.html This seems to be consistent with comments on this list as well. Maybe it works bether for mailservers processing primarily american messages. I don't know since

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB?

2004-08-27 Thread Scott Fisher
It's slightly better for me in the US Over the last week: MTLDB-ALL catches 82.4% SPAM, 17.6% NotSpam MTLDB-LAST catches 83.3% spam, 16.7% Not Spam I give MTLDB-ALL 1 weight and MTLDB-LAST 4 weight Subject Tag at 100, Hold at 200, Delete at 300 weight Scott Fisher Director of IT Farm Progress

[Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB

2004-08-11 Thread Hirthe, Alexander
Hello, I tried to install MTDLB on our Mailserver but when I try to log on I'm getting unknown error 0x800c0005. I removed and reinstalled it, no change. ?? Alex --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB

2004-08-11 Thread Scott Fisher
Is your firewall blocking pings? I had to enable pings to install MTDLB and then disable them again after the install. Scott Fisher Director of IT Farm Progress Companies [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/11/04 10:46AM Hello, I tried to install MTDLB on our Mailserver but when I try to log on I'm getting

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB observations

2004-07-23 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 1:18 PM Unless the database gets cleaned up, I don't see this as a useable test. We're working on that. There will be a major change to the listings within the next week. Scott, has this

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB observations

2004-07-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
Unless the database gets cleaned up, I don't see this as a useable test. We're working on that. There will be a major change to the listings within the next week. Scott, has this happened yet? No. There's an issue with the SQL database that is storing the information, where it can't update

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB observations

2004-07-16 Thread Brad Morgan
Here's what I've seen to date using a Perl script I've written to monitor the results. I'll leave the test active for a while longer but I've reduced the weight of the MTLDB test to 0. Unless the database gets cleaned up, I don't see this as a useable test. At the moment, hp.com, sun.com,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB observations

2004-07-16 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: Brad Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here's what I've seen to date using a Perl script I've written to monitor the results. I'll leave the test active for a while longer but I've reduced the weight of the MTLDB test to 0. Unless the database gets cleaned up, I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB observations

2004-07-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
Unless the database gets cleaned up, I don't see this as a useable test. We're working on that. There will be a major change to the listings within the next week. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB observations

2004-07-16 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless the database gets cleaned up, I don't see this as a useable test. We're working on that. There will be a major change to the listings within the next week. Please announce to the list when these changes have been

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB observations

2004-07-16 Thread Matt
Scott, If you need a hand with this, I have become quite familiar with the methods used by similar tests, such as CBL, to cleanse their listings and I would gladly contribute my knowledge to help you avoid listing legitimate servers. I shared some of this when it was first released, but I

[Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB Issue?

2004-07-13 Thread Grant Griffith - Declude JM
Scott Said: We are looking into an issue where the MTLDB may not be returning positive responses, and should have more information later today on that. -Scott Is there going to be another release that fixes this issue? Or is there a solution

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB Issue?

2004-07-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
We are looking into an issue where the MTLDB may not be returning positive responses, and should have more information later today on that. Is there going to be another release that fixes this issue? Or is there a solution at this point? The issue was on our end, and fixed yesterday.

[Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB observations

2004-07-13 Thread Scott Fisher
MTLDB seems to be a lot more effective on NON-US e-mail. Based on COUNTRY Not = US Out of 380 that qualify: 6 Non Spams and 374 SPAMs Based on COUNTRY = US Out of 395 that qualify: 148 Non Spams and 247 SPAMS Scott Fisher Director of IT Farm Progress Companies --- [This E-mail was scanned

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB Issue?

2004-07-13 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] We are looking into an issue where the MTLDB may not be returning positive responses, and should have more information later today on that. Is there going to be another release that fixes this issue? Or is there a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB Issue?

2004-07-13 Thread Markus Gufler
Then why wasn't an update sent out yesterday once the issue was resolved, especially since you announced to the list that there was a know problem that you were looking into? As you have seen over the past few days, communication is key... 7:00 am here now and the most interesting

[Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB effectiveness

2004-07-10 Thread Scott MacLean
I can't say that I am overwhelmed with the effectiveness of the MTLDB test thus far. Every single email I have seen come through my server with the MTLDB test triggered on it has been a false positive - in fact, it seems that user not found automated messages originating from the mail servers

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB effectiveness

2004-07-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
I can't say that I am overwhelmed with the effectiveness of the MTLDB test thus far. Every single email I have seen come through my server with the MTLDB test triggered on it has been a false positive - in fact, it seems that user not found automated messages originating from the mail servers

[Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB Uninstall

2004-07-09 Thread Junkmail Support
Hello all, The test seems to be stable on our system. However, I looked around and there are a couple of DLLs installed on C:\ProgramFiles\ComputerHorizons\MTLDB. One seems to indicate that it is cyphering or creating/using a secure token of some purpose. In scanning the regisrty, I also notice

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB Uninstall

2004-07-09 Thread R. Scott Perry
I also looked in the Control Panel Add/Remove Programs and there is no entry for the MTLDB program that was installed. I looked for an uninstall method and couldn't find anything. Did I miss something or is it my imagination that the MTLDB test code or registry entries must be manually removed?

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB Uninstall

2004-07-09 Thread Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 5:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB Uninstall I also looked in the Control Panel Add/Remove Programs and there is no entry for the MTLDB