RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-20 Thread John Tolmachoff
Good idea, Bill, I hadn't even thought of using ENDSWITH. Bill Thanks for the tip, Bill. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message Hi; I know this subject was discussed but I can not find it in the archives. We are seeing more and more SPAM that have IP address as return address. I just can't think of a legitimate email that would do that. = X-RBL-Warning: IPNOTINMX:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
We are seeing more and more SPAM that have IP address as return address. I just can't think of a legitimate email that would do that. Actually, what is happening here: X-Declude-Sender: [12.4.218.17] is that the spammer is using a null return address. In this case, the return address

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Markus Gufler
: Sunday, January 19, 2003 7:00 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP Hi; I know this subject was discussed but I can not find it in the archives. We are seeing more and more SPAM that have IP address as return address. I just can't think o

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Dan Patnode
Kami, I believe this can be nailed with: MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS But Scott is correct, this should be used only as a weighted test as it will trigger on every non delivery report and then some. Markus, I would like to expand my search to include some of the types you identified. Any idea

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
Are the gathered in any case from the SMTP-Data or are they created from declude if there was no value? IMail requires that *something* be sent as the MAIL FROM: data, but it could potentially be sent as either or . In either case, Declude will treat it as .

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Kami Razvan
Hi; Is it a viable solution to filter the header for: From: Regards, Kami -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 2:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Dan Patnode
Scott, So you are saying that From: dtcLISA [212.19.66.109] looks the same as From: [212.19.66.109] and both are caught by: MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS ? Thanks Dan On Sunday, January 19, 2003 11:09, R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are the gathered in any case from the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Markus Gufler
I would like to expand my search to include some of the types you identified. Any idea how to nail these with a content filter?: X-Declude-Sender: dtcLISA [212.19.66.109] X-Declude-Sender: FREE [61.194.11.2] The problem is that there are not very much messages without a valid sender

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is it a viable solution to filter the header for: From: No -- a spammer would probably send an E-mail with a return address (MAIL FROM) of , but have a header like From: Youwill berich [EMAIL PROTECTED]. You could filter with something like: MAILFROM2 CONTAINS

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
So you are saying that From: dtcLISA [212.19.66.109] looks the same as From: [212.19.66.109] and both are caught by: MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS No. The will only be used if the return address is or , it will not be used under any other conditions. Note that the dtcLISA one will get

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Dan Patnode
Cool, so all the bases are covered! I also use MAILFROM. :) Dan On Sunday, January 19, 2003 11:50, R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So you are saying that From: dtcLISA [212.19.66.109] looks the same as From: [212.19.66.109] and both are caught by: MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Bill Landry
Razvan Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 12:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP Scott.. Thanks.. I guess this still leaves the other variation up for attack.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] We have seen this also.. When they are sending email with userID and IP. I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Bill B.
How about this... MAILFROM 0 ENDSWITH 0 MAILFROM 0 ENDSWITH 1 MAILFROM 0 ENDSWITH 2 ...etc -Original Message- From: Bill Landry Sent: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 13:15:57 -0800 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP The only way I can think of to currently block an e-mail address

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP

2003-01-19 Thread Bill Landry
Good idea, Bill, I hadn't even thought of using ENDSWITH. Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill B. Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 4:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Return address IP How about