Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Question

2003-12-19 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
Doug, I don't think anything is wrong. SpamC. is returning a TXT record with that information. The link says that's experimental. Burzin At 12:22 PM 12/19/2003, you wrote: I was looking at the headers and saw SPAMCOP : Blocked Is that how it should be - what it's returning? If not, ideas on w

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Question

2003-12-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
I was looking at the headers and saw SPAMCOP : Blocked Is that how it should be - what it's returning? If not, ideas on what could be wrong? That is what it is returning: X-RBL-Warning: SPAMCOP: Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?66.111

[Declude.JunkMail] SPAMCOP Question

2003-12-19 Thread Doug Anderson
I was looking at the headers and saw SPAMCOP : Blocked   Is that how it should be - what it's returning? If not, ideas on what could be wrong?     X-RBL-Warning: SORBS-SPAM: Spam Received See: http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup?IP=66.111.254.21X-RBL-Warning: SPAMCOP: Blocked - see http