Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-19 Thread Matthew Bramble
Scott, I've been looking over this trying to figure out how to best implement it for my domains. It seems that since they are all on one class C, I should do the following: v=spf1 +a/24 +mx/24 -all Now three very important questions... 1) If I implement this, will intra-server E-mail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-19 Thread Kami Razvan
: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta Scott, I've been looking over this trying to figure out how to best implement it for my domains. It seems that since they are all on one class C, I should do the following: v=spf1 +a/24 +mx/24 -all Now three very important questions... 1) If I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
I've been looking over this trying to figure out how to best implement it for my domains. It seems that since they are all on one class C, I should do the following: v=spf1 +a/24 +mx/24 -all Now three very important questions... 1) If I implement this, will intra-server E-mail fail this

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-19 Thread Bill
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta We will be adding support for SPF (Sender Permitted From, at http

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there a way that I can setup this test to only check incoming messages? No (although you can set it up so that no action would be taken for outgoing mail, the weight would still be applied). In this case, WHITELIST AUTH (with works with Declude JunkMail v1.75 and higher, and IMail v8 and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-18 Thread Andy Schmidt
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 06:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta We will be adding support for SPF (Sender Permitted From, at http://spf.pobox.com ) to the next beta of Declude JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
We will be adding support for SPF (Sender Permitted From, at http://spf.pobox.com ) to the next beta of Declude JunkMail. This is a system that lets owners of domains publish information on what mailservers people can use to send mail from the domain. We expect that this can be very useful

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-18 Thread Tom Baker | Netsmith Inc
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta We will be adding support for SPF (Sender Permitted From, at http://spf.pobox.com ) to the next beta of Declude JunkMail. This is a system that lets owners of domains publish information on what mailservers

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
Any chance we can seperate fail unknown into two different tests? via spf we have ?all or -all which are supposed to be treated differently from what I understand. They are treated differently. An SPF lookup can result in PASS, FAIL, or UNKNOWN. So: Ideally I would like something like this:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-18 Thread Tom Baker | Netsmith Inc
?) -Original Message- From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 2:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta Any chance we can seperate fail unknown into two different tests? via spf we have ?all

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-18 Thread Andy Schmidt
: Thursday, December 18, 2003 02:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta We will be adding support for SPF (Sender Permitted From, at http://spf.pobox.com ) to the next beta of Declude JunkMail. This is a system that lets owners of domains

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-18 Thread Markus Gufler
Wow, seeing positive results already! Thanks Scott for getting this implemented so quickly! Guess I will need to setup my SPF records now. I've some questions: Our situation here is, that we host mailservices for several customers. We have also our own DNS servers and so we're able to set

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
Our situation here is, that we host mailservices for several customers. We have also our own DNS servers and so we're able to set up SPF TXT records. But as I understand we can't set up silently this records for all our domains because we can't be sure that all of our clients send all their

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
A) Is there an %SPFSTATUS% variable for use in the headers (that will show FAIL/PASS/UNKNOWN)? No. But we will look into this. B) If not, is there a generic SPF test in the global.cfg, so that I can use one line to create a WARN action e.g. SPF spf * x x x I don't

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-18 Thread Markus Gufler
This will provide positive benefits, without having any negative benefits. If you know a domain will only be sending mail through your mailservers, you can instead use -all at the end (which gives a FAIL result for E-mail sent from other IPs). Ok, thank you for this information. But I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
But I have to know in any case of all the domains that send out legit messages trough our server. No, you do not. You can simply add the v=spf1 +mx ?all to all your domains. However, if you want to take the time to find ones that only send through your server, you can change them from v=spf1

[Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-15 Thread R. Scott Perry
We will be adding support for SPF (Sender Permitted From, at http://spf.pobox.com ) to the next beta of Declude JunkMail. This is a system that lets owners of domains publish information on what mailservers people can use to send mail from the domain. We expect that this can be very useful

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta

2003-12-15 Thread Hosting Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 6:54 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta We will be adding support for SPF (Sender Permitted From, at http://spf.pobox.com ) to the next beta of Declude JunkMail. This is a system that lets