Scott,
I've been looking over this trying to figure out how to best implement
it for my domains. It seems that since they are all on one class C, I
should do the following:
v=spf1 +a/24 +mx/24 -all
Now three very important questions...
1) If I implement this, will intra-server E-mail
: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta
Scott,
I've been looking over this trying to figure out how to best implement it
for my domains. It seems that since they are all on one class C, I should
do the following:
v=spf1 +a/24 +mx/24 -all
Now three very important questions...
1) If I
I've been looking over this trying to figure out how to best implement it
for my domains. It seems that since they are all on one class C, I should
do the following:
v=spf1 +a/24 +mx/24 -all
Now three very important questions...
1) If I implement this, will intra-server E-mail fail this
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta
We will be adding support for SPF (Sender Permitted From, at
http
Is there a way that I can setup this test to only check incoming
messages?
No (although you can set it up so that no action would be taken for
outgoing mail, the weight would still be applied).
In this case, WHITELIST AUTH (with works with Declude JunkMail v1.75 and
higher, and IMail v8 and
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 06:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta
We will be adding support for SPF (Sender Permitted From, at
http://spf.pobox.com ) to the next beta of Declude JunkMail
We will be adding support for SPF (Sender Permitted From, at
http://spf.pobox.com ) to the next beta of Declude JunkMail. This is a
system that lets owners of domains publish information on what mailservers
people can use to send mail from the domain. We expect that this can be
very useful
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta
We will be adding support for SPF (Sender Permitted From, at
http://spf.pobox.com ) to the next beta of Declude JunkMail. This is a
system that lets owners of domains publish information on what
mailservers
Any chance we can seperate fail unknown into two different tests?
via spf we have ?all or -all which are supposed to be treated differently
from what I understand.
They are treated differently. An SPF lookup can result in PASS, FAIL, or
UNKNOWN. So:
Ideally I would like something like this:
?)
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 2:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta
Any chance we can seperate fail unknown into two different tests?
via spf we have ?all
: Thursday, December 18, 2003 02:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta
We will be adding support for SPF (Sender Permitted From, at
http://spf.pobox.com ) to the next beta of Declude JunkMail. This is a
system that lets owners of domains
Wow, seeing positive results already! Thanks Scott for
getting this implemented so quickly! Guess I will need to
setup my SPF records now.
I've some questions:
Our situation here is, that we host mailservices for several customers.
We have also our own DNS servers and so we're able to set
Our situation here is, that we host mailservices for several customers.
We have also our own DNS servers and so we're able to set up SPF TXT
records.
But as I understand we can't set up silently this records for all our
domains because we can't be sure that all of our clients send all their
A) Is there an %SPFSTATUS% variable for use in the headers (that will show
FAIL/PASS/UNKNOWN)?
No. But we will look into this.
B) If not, is there a generic SPF test in the global.cfg, so that I can
use one line to create a WARN action e.g.
SPF spf * x x x
I don't
This will provide positive benefits, without having any
negative benefits.
If you know a domain will only be sending mail through your
mailservers, you can instead use -all at the end (which
gives a FAIL result for E-mail sent from other IPs).
Ok, thank you for this information.
But I
But I have to know in any case of all the domains that send out legit
messages trough our server.
No, you do not. You can simply add the v=spf1 +mx ?all to all your domains.
However, if you want to take the time to find ones that only send through
your server, you can change them from v=spf1
We will be adding support for SPF (Sender Permitted From, at
http://spf.pobox.com ) to the next beta of Declude JunkMail. This is a
system that lets owners of domains publish information on what mailservers
people can use to send mail from the domain. We expect that this can be
very useful
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 6:54 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta
We will be adding support for SPF (Sender Permitted From, at
http://spf.pobox.com ) to the next beta of Declude JunkMail. This is a
system that lets
18 matches
Mail list logo