on 4/9/04 1:32 PM, Rick Davidson wrote:
Is it possible to make it so that if a whitelisted TO address is included
with many recipients that only that one particular address is whitelisted
and not everyone in the To field?
Whitelist To [EMAIL PROTECTED]
recieve an email to [EMAIL
sweet!
that will work perfectly
thanks man!
Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message -
From: System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist
Did I miss something here? I created a whitelist for a client (we use DJ
Pro) by adding this line to their domain-specific $default$.junkmail file:
WHITELISTFILE D:\IMail\Declude\PaulsonCommodities\whitelist.txt
(I put it in right before their list of weighted tests).
Inside the whilte list
Did I miss something here? I created a whitelist for a client (we use DJ
Pro) by adding this line to their domain-specific $default$.junkmail file:
WHITELISTFILE D:\IMail\Declude\PaulsonCommodities\whitelist.txt
(I put it in right before their list of weighted tests).
Inside the whilte list
] Whitelist setup problem
Did I miss something here? I created a whitelist for a client (we use DJ
Pro) by adding this line to their domain-specific $default$.junkmail
file:
WHITELISTFILE D:\IMail\Declude\PaulsonCommodities\whitelist.txt
(I put it in right before their list of weighted tests
Thanks Scott. You're saying the whiltelist file needs a blank line at the
end? I didn't have one, but I just added one now.
All Windows text files should have one (it's Microsoft code that won't read
the last line). I don't know off-hand which files in Declude require one,
but it's best to
Tommi,
There seems to be a feature for this built into Imail, but as usual, tests outside of
Declude aren't really useful. I got into trouble last week when the default setting
bounced a non spam.
Dan
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5:50, Tommi Penttinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:54
Unfortunately, that's a problem inherent with SMTP E-mail -- it's
possible for anyone (including a spammer) to send one copy of an E-mail
to many recipients, each of whom is expected to receive an identical copy
of the E-mail.
Scott, Can you make in future declude some limited to many E-mail
At 10:33 27.05.2003 -0400, you wrote:
Unfortunately, that's a problem inherent with SMTP E-mail -- it's
possible for anyone (including a spammer) to send one copy of an E-mail
to many recipients, each of whom is expected to receive an identical
copy of the E-mail.
Scott, Can you make in future
