Hi,
[... sorting on spam weight in spamreview...]
I've solved this be marking the subject line of all hold
messages with [spam %weight%]
Well, I have that too now but. that did not solve the problem because
the subject column in the top windows is empty. Strange, as the subject line
in
] spam review
Hi,
[... sorting on spam weight in spamreview...]
I've solved this be marking the subject line of all hold
messages with [spam %weight%]
Well, I have that too now but. that did not solve the problem because
the subject column in the top windows is empty. Strange, as the subject
Well, I have that too now but. that did not solve the
problem because the subject column in the top windows is
empty. Strange, as the subject line in the window below that
*does* show the subject. Anybody else have this problem too?
It's not a problem.
There is a switch in the config
Hi,
Is Spam Review still being maintained? I have been
able to retrieve an update in the past few months (now using 1.0.48)but
thereis still a bug in there which I would have expected to befixed
by now.
1) When I have a look at spam the Junk Mail Wanings
windows only shows the lines
1.) It's much easier to reply if the original message is in PLAIN -TEXT
Is Spam Review still being maintained?
As I know it's not more maintained by the initial developer, but he has
offered to give the source to someone who is interrested to maintain it in
the future.
1) When I
What would be the best way to do the below :
I've solved this be marking the subject line of all hold messages with
[spam %weight%]
Now you can sort in spamreview by sibject line and it will show all hold
messages in weighted order.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
What would be the best way to do the below :
I've solved this be marking the subject line of all hold messages with
[spam %weight%]
Now you can sort in spamreview by sibject line and it will show all hold
messages in weighted order.
---
[This E-mail scanned
What would be the best way to do the below :
I've solved this be marking the subject line of all hold
messages with [spam %weight%]
For example we hold on 100 points and mark any message above 75 points in
the subject line.
So we have in the $default$.junkmail file
WEIGHT75
product/tools line?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 8:30 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
1.) It's much easier to reply if the original message is in PLAIN -TEXT
Is Spam Review
] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Lawrence
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 6:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
Did anyone have any problem installing Spam Review?
I'm trying to install it on a Windows 2000 Server and it tells
me
That would be great John.
Thanks,
Dean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 12:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
Some what known issue. What you
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Lawrence
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 8:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
Did anyone have any problem installing Spam Review?
I'm trying to install it on a Windows 2000 Server and it tells
me that it needs to update
Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Lawrence
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 9:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
, August 18, 2004 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK!
(And watch for line wraps)
I think this is what the setup.lst file needs to be for Windows Server 2003:
_
[Bootstrap]
SetupTitle=Install
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
Scott, do you know anything about this as a possible addition to your
product/tools line?
It is something
and
sending mail server HELO/IP.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: John Shacklett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 2:59 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17568.html
I remember
Hi. I use Spam
Review to review held messages and usually it dispays the ISO encoded subjects
as it's ISO self and not as the interpreted text.
This is the DECLUDE
log entry for an email that triggered on these content
filters:
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS
-
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS
=
SUBJECT 2
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andyb
Sent: Friday,
September 26, 2003 8:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] spam
review
Couple of question:
How do I get the Weight: to show? I have it setup
Can you give me the syntax for that?
- Original Message -
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
How do I get the Weight: to show?
Andy,
It's not the answer but maybe
Can you give me the syntax for that?
Assuming you have configured 2 weight tests like
WEIGHT10
WEIGHT20
in your global.cfg file and you want to hold on 20 points:
Set the two actions
WEIGHT10 SUBJECT [spam%WEIGHT%]
WEIGHT20 HOLD
in your $default$.junkmail file. (Note the space after the ]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
Can you give me the syntax for that?
Assuming you have configured 2 weight tests like
WEIGHT10
WEIGHT20
in your global.cfg file and you want to hold on 20 points:
Set the two actions
WEIGHT10 SUBJECT [spam%WEIGHT%]
WEIGHT20 HOLD
in your
:51 AM
To: Declude (JM)
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review
Importance: Low
Has there been any update yet on getting Spam Review's Add to Kill
button to actually work?
John Olden
Systems Administrator - Champaign Park District
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 9:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst problem question
Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you are having problems with adding to kill.lst please review the
following and let me know if this is or is not your
Scott, would it be possible to use instead of X-Sender, something like:
XINHEADER X-Addr: %MAILFROM% [%REMOTEIP%]
or something other than X-Sender so that we do not end up with multiple
X-Sender entries?
Yes, that would work fine.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was
How about:
Here is the headers that I am inserting - in case that helps:
XINHEADER X-Declude: Version %VERSION%; %QUEUENAME% from %REVDNS%
[%REMOTEIP%]
XINHEADER X-Declude: Failed %TESTSFAILED% [%WEIGHT%]
XINHEADER Return-Path: %MAILFROM%
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1
-Original Message-
From: Tom Schwarz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst problem question
So do I/We need to decide on what needs to be used so I can program
spamreview to support both
Tom, how about using:
XINHEADER X-SenderIP: [%REMOTEIP%]
since isn't is really the remote IP address that we are looking for, and not
necessarily the e-mail address? Or am I confused. What are we looking for
here, the original sending mail servers IP address or something else?
There are
PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst problem question
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst
I second this!!
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bennie
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
Hey Tom,
I have a suggestion... :)
On your spam
I'm getting the weight just fine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
Noticed after updating to v1.0.12
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 11:18 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
Power is back and life is getting back to normal so I thought I would post
an update. The last update I posted the first person that downloaded it
found a major problem. I
TOM
I second Bennie's Great suggestion, that would be a great feature.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bennie
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 6:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7 on Saturday 10:18:30 AM
Seems to me the best way to handle same sender messages is to
detect within the program matching senders than ask with a popup
'Delete all instances of this sender?' Yes No. or even have
has
an option to add to the imail kill list, but that requires a restart of
SMTP.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Heath
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 7:22 PM
To: Tom Schwarz
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update
All
I am wanting to do is a quick way to remove blocks from the review of spams
that have been caught...
Bennie
- Original Message -
From: Todd Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 9:02 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
for in the
first place.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bennie
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 10:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
But with the black list the sender of the spam would
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 11:18 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
Power is back and life is getting back to normal so I thought I would post
an update. The last update I posted the first person that downloaded it
found a major problem. I
: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Question
On some of the email I review I would like to click a button and send an
email back to the sender, based on a template, letting them know that they
have a problem. It could include all the warnings. Is this a feature that
others would use if it was available?
Tom
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Question on Wednesday 9:38:23 AM
Actually, the next most useful feature for me would
be to take the real sender and add-to-kill.lst function.
Then if you consistently see an abuser, you just add his
address to Imails kill file
Yes, actually, I would love to be able to just forward/redirect the message
to my SPAMCOP mailbox. I currently do that automatically with Declude for
Weight 20 and above.
Then SPAMCOPY will figure out who REALLY is to notify - because sending it
back to the originator in 99 out of 100 times
Roger.
Where do you ad this line?
Bennie
This line gives me the 'real' sender and I'd love to kill.lst
some of these if they are clearly doing only spamming...:
XINHEADER X-Note: SMTP Real-From: %MAILFROM%
I do not see an immediate need to notify senders of bad mail.
--
-
From: andyb@thumpernet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Question
Hi,
absolutely
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Wednesday, January
. Love the app so far.
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Heath
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Tom Schwarz
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Question
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam
Kudos to Tom! Wonderful tool.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Watchman
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is fantastic
Thanks Tom, Spam Review
http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Webmaster
Oilfield Directory
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is fantastic
Did i miss
nope! that doesn't work, tells me your not authorized to view that page.
Nice try anyway.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is fantastic
http
Sorry...
http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Webmaster
Oilfield Directory
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review it is fantastic
nope
Let's talk about the IMail kill.lst file for just a minute.
Some of you suggested that you wanted to add from email addresses to the
kill.lst file from SpamReview. I like this idea and am working on it.
My question is...
How do you want it to work?
Do you want a button to do it?
Do you want
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review and Kill File
Let's talk about the IMail kill.lst file for just a minute.
Some of you suggested that you wanted to add from email addresses to the
kill.lst file from SpamReview. I like
it just in case.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Todd Holt
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review and Kill File
I would prefer a separate button. Because when I delete
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review and Kill File on Wednesday 6:56:42 PM
I always thought you must recycle the SMTP for any change
in Imail, rules.ima, kill.lst, etc. I think this may be
because some of these settings are held in memory for speed.
http
addresses are bogus.
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review and Kill File
Let's talk about the IMail kill.lst file
]]On Behalf Of Roger Heath
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:42 PM
To: Chuck Schick
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review and Kill File
Reply to: Chuck Schick
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review and Kill File on Wednesday 6:30:12
PM
Suppose you could have a setting that would allow you
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 5:35 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program
Delete, Insert, and Refresh keys will add to the program. I will add them
soon.
I am going to change the rules on picking up weight. I will document that
carefully when I do
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program
Importance: Low
I was setting up a networkpath path eg. \\123.123.123.123\imail for the log
files. But There was a type-o so I got a runtime error.
Now when I start the program
By default don't your new configuation files put out a warning at 10?
Yes, that is correct.
The XINHEADER X-Note: Total weight of %WEIGHT%. could be used instead, so
that the weight appears in all E-mails (whether or not the weight is
greater than or equal to 10).
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 3:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program
Yes http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Attached is a perl program I use to categorize spam subjects for review. It
is a portion of an analysis batch file that addresses several other problems
such as moving the spam from the \IMAIL\SPOOL\SPAM holding area before
analysis so that the spam that pours in during analysis won't be deleted
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program on Sunday 4:00:21 PM
This is super Tom. You are really saving me one heck
of a lot of time. It looks nicer all the time. I like
the switch from text to html display. Since you are
adding features, figured I'd list a few
I have received several replies. If it's ok with Declude, I will post the
download address on this list. If someone from Declude would reply to me I
would appreciate it.
This program will be Freeware (I hate spam) and will only be supported to
the extent that I have time to support it (I have
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program on Saturday 10:28:46 AM
I appreciate this. It would prove useful if it works well.
I manage my files over a network, all but the drive is ok
in that path. I'd like a copy, but I am already wondering
if I can change the path
I have received several replies. If it's ok with Declude, I will post the
download address on this list. If someone from Declude would reply to me I
would appreciate it.
Feel free to post it. I can also include a link at
http://www.declude.com/tools .
-Scott
---
[This
Exactly 15 hours after I sat down at a computer to write a program to review
spam email I have a first release. I tell you this so you won't yell at me
if you find a bug. Feel free however to report bugs and suggest
enhancements.
You can locate this software at
can i use a unc to get to the spooled files or does it have to be mapped?
thanks!!
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 12:48 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Software
Exactly 15 hours after I
Either will work.
\\myserver\imail\spool
or
c:\imail\spool
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Jones, Jr.
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Software
can i
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Software
Either will work.
\\myserver\imail\spool
or
c:\imail\spool
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Jones, Jr.
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Software
I must be missing something, because I have tried it both ways and it just
doesn't seem to list any emails... there are over 100 in the spool\spam
dir...
Thanks,
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Software on Saturday 1:28:47 PM
Thanks, Tom. It is working nicely here. It is much faster
as once you delete and confirm the focus is on the appropriate
button, so once it starts you can just keep hitting Enter
until you get
Hi,
Has it been posted anywhere yet?
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.thumpernet.com
315-282-0020
Saturday, January 26, 2002, 11:28:46 AM, you wrote:
TS I have received several replies. If it's ok with Declude, I will post the
TS download address on this list. If someone
Yes http://www.slsoft.com/spamreview.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of andyb@thumpernet
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 4:00 PM
To: Tom Schwarz
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program
Hi,
Has it been posted
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program on Saturday 10:28:46 AM
Tom, I am really enjoying the speed of your app.
You web page mentions that you place a weight message
in your headers using Declude but does not show how this
is done. Can you show this here? I'd
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program on Saturday 6:43:32 PM
We have never seen the default message when a weight of 10
occurs. We have seen it when greater than 20 occurs. I thought
perhaps you are using a specific format with perhaps a undocumented
variable
Scott,
By default don't your new configuation files put out a warning at 10?
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 7:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review
73 matches
Mail list logo
