PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: KITHRUP:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Sniffer
That is about average, over 50% of our inbound mail fails at least one
test
(more like 70%)...
This is where the weighing system comes into play.
Tests like no postmaster and no abuse fail every message from
Monday, July 29, 2002 you wrote:
DL Anyone have any idea's on why they wouldn't have those addresses setup?
They don't set them up. My guess is because they handle too much
volume. I suspect it would take a significant staff to handle what
they would get in postmaster and abuse.
---
I would be interested in seeing what some of you have as myfilter.txt
list. I have been adding to mine and find it is a time consuming
experience to say the least. One that has been paying for itself
though. Being inexperienced in this endeavor, though, I realize I may
be going into overkill.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: KITHRUP:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Sniffer
I would be interested in seeing what some of you have as myfilter.txt
list. I have been adding to mine and find it is a time consuming
experience to say the least. One that has been paying for itself
though. Being
: Sunday, July 28, 2002 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: KITHRUP:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Sniffer
I would be interested in seeing what some of you have as myfilter.txt
list. I have been adding to mine and find it is a time consuming
experience to say the least. One that has been
PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: KITHRUP:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Sniffer
That is about average, over 50% of our inbound mail fails at least one
test
(more like 70%)...
This is where the weighing system comes into play.
Tests like no postmaster and no abuse fail every message from
systems
like aol.com
