:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
(Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 5:36 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
So SmarterMail says they were deleting them. My question is when? Files
related to an incomplete e-mail session
D] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Steiner
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:04 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
I don't know. I'm still trying to understand the "problem". Declude added
a "fix
sday, July 12, 2006 1:04 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
>
> I don't know. I'm still trying to understand the "problem". Declude
added a "fix" to
> 4.2.20 that moves files to the error dire
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:33 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
Gary,
If we gave you the option to delete these messages (as S
fix soon that will make this issue moot.
Original Message
> From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 7:48 AM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
&g
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 5:00 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
We are running Imail 8.22. I did the upgrade on Saturday, so far no
problems. I backed down from 4.2 b12 to 4.09 as I was getting email without
declude adding h
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:41 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
As far as I'm concerned it's not a solution. SmarterMail deleting these
messages was not a problem for me, Declude dumping them into the error
fol
ssage
> From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 5:49 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
>
> Gary,
>
> From time to time I feel like the Declude p
ff and put things back to the way
they were?
Original Message
> From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:10 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
&
m: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John
T (Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 6:33 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
Mark, try this.
Go to Windows Search function.
Search files *.hdr
Search text in f
MAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
T (Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 6:33 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
Mark, try this.
Go to Windows Search function.
Search files *.hdr
Search text in files failed
Search only the error dir
Mark
> Strother
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:34 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
>
> As long as someone is working on this. I have 20,000 messages in the
> error directory from the past 48 hours. Ob
, July 11, 2006 2:35 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
Gary,
>From time to time I feel like the Declude pinyada but in this instance
we
have provided a solution for what is happening in SM. And as I have said
we
are working w
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Steiner
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 5:31 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
I don't have an answer to this question. I just know that it is a problem.
But what I find amusing is, here is
Original Message
> From: "John T \(Lists\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 5:21 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
>
> Although I do not use SmarterMail, my take is t
ginal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
> Steiner
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 12:13 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
>
> Here is SmarterTools take on the pr
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Kevin Bilbee
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:49 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
>
> How about if the message has failed in the .hdr file declude just
> ignores the file t
: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
How about if the message has failed in the .hdr file declude just ignores
the file to let SmarterMail process it as it see fit???
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
006 12:26 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
>
> Not sure who you spoke to at SmarterTools but I do NOT believe this is
> true.
>
>
> Declude will not pick up a message until it is completed writing bot
a problem.
Original Message
> From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 3:24 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
>
> Gary,
>
> This is a S
a
problem.
Original Message
> From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 3:24 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
>
> Gary,
>
> This is a Sma
We are running Imail 8.22. I did the upgrade on Saturday, so far no
problems. I backed down from 4.2 b12 to 4.09 as I was getting email without
declude adding header information, and I was not able to find any record
in any declude log of the message being processed. So far I have not seen
a simila
el Jaworski
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 12:28 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
I am getting a lot of these too, some of which show a 421 timeout in the
SmarterMail SMTP logs.
Example: "data transfer failed. 421 Command ti
einer
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 11:52 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
Now that I've installed 4.2.20, I'm getting a lot of messages in the error
folder (I'm running SmarterMail 3.3.2369). Most of them seem to be
the messages in the
\spool.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Steiner
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 2:52 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.2 build 20 Released 6 July 2006
Now
Now that I've installed 4.2.20, I'm getting a lot of messages in the error
folder (I'm running SmarterMail 3.3.2369). Most of them seem to be spam, but
there are some good messages in there. Am I now going to have to scan this
folder for false positives just like the held spam folder?
Here is
David,
What is the status on fixing the broken image spam problem?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
> Barker
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 9:42 AM
> To: Declude.Virus@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: [Declude.J
27 matches
Mail list logo
