re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail?

2005-08-24 Thread decludeinfo
I've been using Declude with SmarterMail for about six weeks. I'm generally pleased with the results except for some minor problems. Two problems that I've run into that I can't seem to get resolution from Declude support are: 1. When certain spams are sent to multiple addresses on the server

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail?

2005-08-24 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
e.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail? > > That is a big gaping hole in my opinion. Guess I'll look for another > solution as I don't think I can wait for declude to get around to fixing > this oversight. > > Thanks for your feedback. >

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail?

2005-08-24 Thread Imail Admin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:18 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail? > That is a big gaping hole in my opinion. Guess I'll look for another > solution as I don't think I can wait for declude to get around to f

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail?

2005-08-24 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:18 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail? > > > That

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and SmarterMail?

2005-08-24 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
eclude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail? > > That is a big gaping hole in my opinion. Guess I'll look for another > solution as I don't think I can wait for declude to get around to fixing > this oversight. > > Thanks f

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail?

2005-08-24 Thread Dave Beckstrom
ROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:13 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail? > > Biggest issues is the lack of WHITELIST AUTH. I confirmed last week with > SMarterMail that that funct

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail?

2005-08-24 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Biggest issues is the lack of WHITELIST AUTH. I confirmed last week with SMarterMail that that functionality will be available in the 3.0 version du out later this year. Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom > Se

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and SmarterMail

2005-02-07 Thread Barry Simpson
Peter,   Contact me off list re trial for Declude/SmarterMail.   Barry     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mailing Lists Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 7:37 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and SmarterMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail

2004-12-29 Thread Mailing Lists
: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 1:05 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail Barry,   I did request a beta and you personally actually gave me the codes ): I wont post them here for obvious purposes.   I then filed a bug, actually Declude/SM didnt work at all on

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail

2004-12-29 Thread Darin Cox
, 2004 1:05 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail Barry,   I did request a beta and you personally actually gave me the codes ): I wont post them here for obvious purposes.   I then filed a bug, actually Declude/SM didnt work at all on our lab server - tkt number is IGG-76544

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail

2004-12-29 Thread Mailing Lists
communications problem within Declude (compare the tkt to this post):   Peter   - Original Message - From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <Declude.JunkMail@declude.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:44 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Sma

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail

2004-12-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
al Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mailing Lists Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:16 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail Where is the beta download, it seems like it was removed last week from

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail

2004-12-29 Thread Mailing Lists
anxious to see if this works out for us? Peter - Original Message - From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:00 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail There should be NO production Declude/SmarterMail ins

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail

2004-12-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail Harry Palmer wrote: >> Does anyone actually have a production Smarter Mail/Declude server in > use? > > We have a production SmarterMail server hosting 27 sites with 1800+ > users. SmarterMail r

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail

2004-12-29 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Can I ask... (if you can't say it's ok)... does it hook in directly to SmarterMail and can do all the actions just like with IMail? Or is it an exe that runs when mail comes in and all it can do is delete mail? I'm using a scanner now that does ClamAV + SpamAssassin but all that can do really

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail

2004-12-29 Thread Joshua Levitsky
Harry Palmer wrote: Does anyone actually have a production Smarter Mail/Declude server in use? We have a production SmarterMail server hosting 27 sites with 1800+ users. SmarterMail replaced IMail here on December 14, 2004. SmarterMail performance has been very good. We tested Declude with S

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail

2004-12-29 Thread Harry Palmer
Title: Declude and Smartermail > Does anyone actually have a production Smarter Mail/Declude server in use?    We have a production SmarterMail server hosting 27 sites with 1800+ users. SmarterMail replaced IMail here on December 14, 2004. SmarterMail performance has been very good. We teste