I've been following this thread pretty close and can say that it is a
feature that would greatly enhance Declude Junkmail. I have a friend who
wrote his own email client about 3 years ago, he implemented this exact same
functionality and it has worked extremely well for years. Blocks spam, good
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Enhancements - unknown sender must reply
to ack
>How would this work as an action? Would there be an action that occurs on
>every message?
"CATCHALLMAILS CONFIRM", for example (which would require confirmation for
any E-mails that were sent
>>2- Will it be server and per user based? I don't want to configure
anything
>>on the client for this and I don't want to traffic to/from the client for
>>confirm request/receipt.
>It would be set up as an action, so it could be set up for specific
>users/domains.
How would this work as an act
I think that is already available in the Pro version.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Enhancements - unknown sender must reply
to ack
> Thanks and I want to p
> Thanks and I want to push for this product!!
Ditto. Add to the requested feature list the ability to opt out entire
domains in Declude Std, as well as individual accts at the Pro level.
--Matt Robertson--
MSB Designs, Inc.
http://mysecretbase.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
I have to agree that this could be one of the most powerful tools yet to
fight SPAM. I would pay money for this even if it were a seperate product!
A couple of questions about the implementation:
1- If the sender does not acknowledge the confirm request, do they go onto
the blacklist? This coul
