Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] [OT] Exchange2Aliases - Error Object not a Collection

2005-01-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
The users causing the problem do not have an exchange tab in AD Users Computers. There is an email field that is blank though. (Sorry for the delay.) This is very suspicious and points to AD corruption, or at the very least an aberrant procedure for enabling/disabling

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop not testing?

2005-01-12 Thread Ernesto
Scott, Thanks for the reply. I have checked my DNS settings, but everything is fine. I've checked again, and nothing is being detected as spam, even when the IPs are listed. Actually, none of the other tests, such as SORBS, DSBL, AHBL, etc are giving any positives. If it really is my DNS

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting tactic..

2005-01-12 Thread Andy Schmidt
Title: Message Hi: Draw whatever conclusions you choose for yourself. I have nottaken the bar in any state and am not qualified to enter into any argument.I reserve the right to base my lay-person opinion onthe anecdotal evidence from the first-hand and personalconversation with active

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop not testing?

2005-01-12 Thread Markus Gufler
It is important to note that you should only have one DNS server listed in the IMail SMTP settings (IMail has a known sporadic issue if there are multiple DNS servers listed). Really? I've listed 3 DNS for over 4 years now without any problem. Is there any KB article? Markus --- [This

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop not testing?

2005-01-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
It is important to note that you should only have one DNS server listed in the IMail SMTP settings (IMail has a known sporadic issue if there are multiple DNS servers listed). Really? I've listed 3 DNS for over 4 years now without any problem. Is there any KB article? I'm not sure if they have

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop not testing?

2005-01-12 Thread Ernesto
That did it! I completely forgot to look in the SMTP dns settings. Once I changed that, bang...lot's o' Spam being caught. Thanks! - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 9:13 AM Subject: Re:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Forwarding and Hosting on IMail vs. SmarterMail

2005-01-12 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Hi Dave, When you say a cache server do you mean a server that takes incoming mail, Decludes it and then passes it on to a server where the mailboxes are (I call this my scanning server)? Also what type of hardware are you running to process 150,000 msgs a day? Thanx Goran

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting tactic..

2005-01-12 Thread Matt
Title: Message Andy, You are right. I wasn't suggesting that prosecution under Virginia law was incorrect, clearly they have more qualified people than myself arguing and deciding such cases and they have concluded that they do. For what it matters, I also have no doubt that it is illegal,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Forwarding and Hosting on IMail vs. SmarterMail

2005-01-12 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi Goran- I'm not running Declude on this box. It's just an offsite backup MX cache that holds mail if the main server is unavailable and delivers it to the main server when it comes back up. It's running on a ProLiant 1850 with dual 550mHz P3s. Average processor usage runs around 5-7%. The

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop not testing?

2005-01-12 Thread Chuck Schick
Scott: Do you have do you have any further information about this statement - what type of errors, etc. It is important to note that you should only have one DNS server listed in the IMail SMTP settings (IMail has a known sporadic issue if there are multiple DNS servers listed). We have used

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop not testing?

2005-01-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
Do you have do you have any further information about this statement - what type of errors, etc. It is important to note that you should only have one DNS server listed in the IMail SMTP settings (IMail has a known sporadic issue if there are multiple DNS servers listed). The issue I am aware of

[Declude.JunkMail] Outgoing mail

2005-01-12 Thread Jeff Kratka
To prevent Declude JM from scanning outbound mail I know I can whitelist IP ranges. Can they be anywhere in the global.cfg or do they need to be at the top. Jeff Kratka TymeWyse Internet P.O.Box 84 - 110 Ecklund St., Canyonville, OR 97417 tel/fax:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outgoing mail

2005-01-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
To prevent Declude JM from scanning outbound mail I know I can whitelist IP ranges. Can they be anywhere in the global.cfg or do they need to be at the top. In general, any configuration options can go anywhere in the config files, with the exception of test actions in the global.cfg file (which

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting tactic..

2005-01-12 Thread S.J.Stanaitis
Yea, Dan Rather. Hah! Dan Geiser wrote: Yes, but Dennis Fisher is a senior editor at eWeek. Don't they have someone give these article the once over before printing them? - Original Message - From: "Matt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, January

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop not testing?

2005-01-12 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Ernesto, I am not sure if anyone else has covered this or even if this is applicable, but some ISP's like ATT will deny DNS queries for known spam lists like SPAMCOP while allowing other ones to go through. Darrell

[Declude.JunkMail] SPF uptake results in...

2005-01-12 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Title: Message ... a decline in the good guys making the MAILFROM some other domain, like the target addressee itself? I have a simple filter file called Spoof which triggers when an inbound mail hasa MAILFROM in my domain instead of theirs. Typical good-but-clueless senders included:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF uptake results in...

2005-01-12 Thread Matt
Title: Message I've seen comments that during Christmas '02, many e-card sites would forge, but by '03 most had change their methods, and I didn't personally see any e-card issues this year. I believe that the same thing has been happening elsewhere. Another big issue was the

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF uptake results in...

2005-01-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
. . . I haven't yet seen whether or not CDO allows for this, and if it doesn't, it predisposes the developer to forge. FYI, CDO (CDOSYS) allows for the requisite separate values. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division

[Declude.JunkMail] Unknown error code

2005-01-12 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi, A message today from Len Conrad at IMGate failed the BADHEADERS and ROUTING tests. The error code returned by both tests was the same: a004010f The lookup on declude.com doesn't know what this means. Help ??? -d --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus