Kris,
The R and L represent Remote and Local, respectively. From these log lines,
it appears that there are in fact two recipients (maybe one of them is the
copyall account).
If you set your LOGLEVEL to DEBUG and send a similar message to a single
recipient, the log file should then show the
Scott,
No, Declude has not yet been tested with Imail 8.2,
although we expect to begin some testing very shortly. We have been in the
process of resolving some outstanding issues and preparing to do an interim
release. It would have been counter-productive to introduce a new IMail platform
Of David Franco-Rocha [
Declude ]Sent: Thursday,
April 28, 2005 8:39 AMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail
8.20
Scott,
No, Declude has not yet been
tested with Imail 8.2, although we expect
ave posted the resolution for those that are
not aware.
Other than that, declude appears to be working
fine here.
- Original Message -
From:
David
Franco-Rocha [ Declude ]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:
Declude does not currently plug directly into SmarterMail's spam tools. They
are completely separate. The MAILBOX directive used by Declude with IMail,
whereby an email is moved to a specific user folder, is not available on the
SmarterMail platform. When I have discussed this with SmarterMail,
There is a very specific reason for this process. Unlike IMail, which
provides for a daisy-chain mechanism whereby Declude gets the msg for
processing and hands it back to smtp32 for delivery, SmarterMail passes the
msg to Declude and, after a set period of time, tries to deliver it. Taking
it
the email immediately.
- Original Message -
From: David Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ] Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 4:34 PM
Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail
Hello David,
Friday, April 29, 2005, 4:27:38 PM
See below.
David Franco-Rocha
- Original Message -
From: David Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 5:28 PM
Subject: Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail
Hello David,
Friday, April 29, 2005, 4:55:53 PM, you wrote:
DFRD No,
are retained in memory by
SmarterMail.
That sounds like it could lead to a memory leak. I tried SM as a SmartHost
caching server and deleted all returns beforee SM could send them. About
once a week I had to reboot the machine. Now I think I know why.
-d
- Original Message -
From: David Franco
Not sure about Outlook.
Outlook Express cuts off most headers if you use the Forward icon. Instead,
select Message from the top-level menu and then select Forward As
Attachment. The forwarded email will have all the headers intact.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical Support
- Original
John,
This problem was reported previously to us and has been corrected in the
latest interim release.
It is caused by broken mail clients that do not terminate header lines with
the required cr/lf sequence.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical Support
- Original Message -
From: John
I expect to have the fix for this issue available tomorrow.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical Support
- Original Message -
From: Shayne Embry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 4:14 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST LOCAL
with Declude, but this struck
me as the most obvious.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical Support
- Original Message -
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] custom delivery
David,
I will get back to you (and the list) on this by Monday. I have to scan the
entire Declude source tree for these types of messages and will let you
know.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical Support
- Original Message -
From: David Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED
emails from a single
message.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical Support
- Original Message -
From:
Richard
Farris
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 4:24 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisting
I just took out all the email
Todd,
The engineering staff here at Declude has no role in the development or
maintenance of the web site. Our sole priority in engineering is the
maintenance and development of the product.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical / Engineering
- Original Message -
From: Todd [EMAIL
AVAFTERJM ON must be in the virus.cfg file (if it is used) and it does
require the ON parameter.
David Franco-Rocha
- Original Message -
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 9:08 PM
Subject: Re:
through the test program to check that the start of the body
is accurately detected. Thanks.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical / Engineering
as
possible through the test program to check that the start of the body is
accurately detected. Thanks.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical / Engineering
line terminators. Sometimes there are mixes of spaces and tabs or multiples
of each. We anticipate including this fix in the next interim release.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical / Engineering
- Original Message -
From: Mark Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
The 3.0 version of SmarterMail, yet to be released, will pass authentication
information to Declude. For those of you who have been patiently waiting to
implement WHITELIST AUTH with SmarterMail, please be advised that Declude
will support that functionality with SmarterMail 3.0.
David Franco
release to default properly to HOP 0 if the directive is omitted.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical / Engineering
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can
shortly.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical / Engineering
- Original Message -
From:
Bonno Bloksma
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 6:31
AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] testing
mailserver
Hi,
I was testing our
The issue of false positives with the SPF test, reported by a couple of
people, has been fixed. This will be included in the next release of the
software (post 3.0.5.18).
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical / Engineering
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
Dean,
There is currently no way to exclude emails from
being scanned by Declude. All emails are checked; only the actions taken can
vary by domain. We may provide finer tuning of that as a future enhancement.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical / Engineering
- Original Message
When scanning for viruses after JunkMail through use of the above directive,
the following rule applies:
All email will continue to be scanned for viruses EXCEPT those emails having
a final JunkMail action of:
HOLD
DELETE
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical / Engineering
---
[This E-mail
With reference to the problem reported regarding the detection of
attachments in email, please be advised that we are looking into this issue
today.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical / Engineering
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail
, not on the
envelope. That is why you can have different results like in this case. The
X-Declude-Sender: x-header is the sender as specified in the
envelope.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical / Engineering
- Original Message -
From:
Scott
Fisher
To: Declude.JunkMail
pong
- Original Message -
From:
Shaun Patterson
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 4:06
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] ping
ping ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to
Kevin,
I am very well aware of what byte sequences constitute the end of a line.
However, if the problem were this simple it would have been fixed long ago.
Contrary to what some have said here, we have seen many instances where
IMail likewise appends its headers to the end of the message.
30 matches
Mail list logo
